Re: Fw: Equal Temperament

2004-01-30 Thread LGS-Europe
** - Original Message - From: "Taco Walstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "lutelist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jon Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 9:26 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Equal Temperament > On Frida

Re: Fw: Equal Temperament

2004-01-30 Thread Jon Murphy
Taco, Your message is well taken, but the details of the specific differences is what I was trying to avoid. My impression from her message was that she needed a small impression of the idea of temperaments rather than a full description. As her message to me was off the harp list I expect that if

Re: Fw: Equal Temperament

2004-01-30 Thread G.R. Crona
- Original Message - From: "Taco Walstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "lutelist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jon Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 30. januar 2004 09:26 Subject: Re: Fw: Equal Temperament | On Friday 30 January 2004 06:50, Jon Murphy

Re: Fw: Equal Temperament

2004-01-30 Thread Taco Walstra
On Friday 30 January 2004 06:50, Jon Murphy wrote: Dear Jon, I wonder if this Catherine is helped by your explanation because you do not explain anything of the background of differences between temperaments in your long e-mail. For example meantone has pure thirds etc. If you want the explain

Fw: Equal Temperament

2004-01-29 Thread Jon Murphy
Ladies and gentlemen,=20 I ask your indulgence in reviewing this message that I have forwarded to = the Lute List. The question comes from the Harp List, and my response = has been sent. I'd like to know if I've made any gross errors (the = object was to answer in principle, not in detail). Do rem