[LUTE] Re: [OT] Tonality in the Baroque

2019-01-10 Thread Guilherme Barroso
I don't know what was the context in Fuchs book. But a lot of times when these terms appear in later sources is to identify a specific note in the scale. For instance, Dlasolre can only be the d below the first line in the G clef. Because according to the solmization thats is the

[LUTE] Re: [OT] Tonality in the Baroque

2019-01-09 Thread Mark Probert
RalfD wrote: > > ??? Whut? That system was widely used well into the 19th (!sic) > century. It's just that a lot of researches tend to skip the > early chapters of contemporary manuals. Just have a look at some of > the most important instruction manuals and how much (expensive!) > space they

[LUTE] Re: [OT] Tonality in the Baroque

2019-01-09 Thread Ralf Mattes
Am Mittwoch, 09. Januar 2019 23:42 CET, Mark Probert schrieb:

[LUTE] Re: [OT] Tonality in the Baroque

2019-01-09 Thread Ralf Mattes
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2019 00:03 CET, howard posner schrieb: > > > On Jan 9, 2019, at 2:42 PM, Mark Probert wrote: > > > > And I am, sad to say, ignorant of the actual meaning of "D la.sol.re". > > I believe it’s just a convention of combining varying names for one note: D > might

[LUTE] Re: [OT] Tonality in the Baroque

2019-01-09 Thread howard posner
> On Jan 9, 2019, at 2:42 PM, Mark Probert wrote: > > And I am, sad to say, ignorant of the actual meaning of "D la.sol.re". I believe it’s just a convention of combining varying names for one note: D might be la, re or sol depending on which hexachord you assume, so it became standard to