[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Thanks to those who pointed out the errors in my manner of inserting
   interpolations - in fact, I did try to do something like this by
   putting in spaces and inserting a dash before my comments, but much was
   lost by the system not copying how I separated text (eg see the extract
   below).  And I don't understand why this is either..
   regards
   Martyn

   On Saturday, 5 September 2020, 17:52:20 BST, Ralf Mattes
wrote:
   On 05.09.20 18:29, G. C. wrote:
   >  PS What might also be good, would be the ability to send parts
   of
   >  messages in bold/italic etc which the current system  seems
   to
   >  put into
   >  plain text. For example, my interpolations here would be
   clearer
   >  if put
   >  in bold.
   Why ignore the de-facto standard that exist for quotes in mails since
   the beginning of time (long before "the internet" became a thing).
   Quotes are prefixed with '>' (or, if you insist, with '|'). That way
   you
   can even quote quotes etc.
   Any decent mail client will do this automatically when you chose to
   'reply' to an email.
   >You could yourself have made them clearer by putting marks like
   plus
   >signs or asterisks or whatever at beginning and end. I know that
   >separating text doesn't seem to work sometimes,  and don't
   understand
   >why that  is.
   >G.
   Cheers, Ralf Mattes
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread David Smith
This is where I have some disagreement. Having a purely personal effort is 
great but fragile. If there was an international Lute body then it would be 
great. There isn't.

So, who wants to take on the personal responsibility that Wayne has for all 
these years.

My experience from running a number of these is that the personal efforts tend 
to die when the person doing it looses interest. But, maybe this one will be 
different.

Anyway, it will be interesting to see where this goes.

David

-Original Message-
From: [email protected] 
 On Behalf Of Alain Veylit
Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2020 10:02 AM
Cc: 'lutelist Net' 
Subject: [LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

I totally agree with the below:

On 9/5/20 9:16 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
>   6) Should the list/forum be maintained as a separate effort, or should
> it be rolled into the LSA, etc.?
>  - Being a  truly international list has been a great
> feature and strength of Wayne's system and ought to continue as such
> without necessarily being held by any one national society.body
> (e.g. sponsorship, personal vs. organizational liability, domain
> ownership/transferability,  futureproofing, and user 
> rules/guidelines)



To get on or off this list see list information at 
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread Alain Veylit

I totally agree with the below:

On 9/5/20 9:16 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

  6) Should the list/forum be maintained as a separate effort, or should
it be rolled into the LSA, etc.?
 - Being a  truly international list has been a great
feature and strength of Wayne's system and ought to continue as such
without necessarily being held by any one national society.body
(e.g. sponsorship, personal vs. organizational liability, domain
ownership/transferability,  futureproofing, and user rules/guidelines)




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread Ralf Mattes

On 05.09.20 18:29, G. C. wrote:

  PS What might also be good, would be the ability to send parts of
 messages in bold/italic etc which the current system   seems to
  put into
 plain text. For example, my interpolations here would be clearer
  if put
 in bold.


Why ignore the de-facto standard that exist for quotes in mails since 
the beginning of time (long before "the internet" became a thing).

Quotes are prefixed with '>' (or, if you insist, with '|'). That way you
can even quote quotes etc.

Any decent mail client will do this automatically when you chose to 
'reply' to an email.



You could yourself have made them clearer by putting marks like plus
signs or asterisks or whatever at beginning and end. I know that
separating text doesn't seem to work sometimes,  and don't understand
why that  is.
G.


Cheers, Ralf Mattes



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread G. C.
 PS What might also be good, would be the ability to send parts of
messages in bold/italic etc which the current system   seems to
 put into
plain text. For example, my interpolations here would be clearer
 if put
in bold.

   You could yourself have made them clearer by putting marks like plus
   signs or asterisks or whatever at beginning and end. I know that
   separating text doesn't seem to work sometimes,  and don't understand
   why that  is.
   G.

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Dear Ron,
   See my interpolations below. In short, please duplicate as closely as
   reasonably possible the format and mechanisms etc of Wayne's list
   regards
   Martyn

   On Saturday, 5 September 2020, 16:33:02 BST, Ron Banks
wrote:
   I don't really know who (if anyone) is working on a replacement for the
   lute list(s) and a classified site, or how far along they've gotten in
   the process.  Also, Wayne's early comments in this thread about not
   replicating the old list and classified site are also very appropriate,
   since his sites were based on proprietary code.  It might also be a
   very good time to verify what the community needs really are, as they
   may have changed since 1998.  While I love the portability of this list
   (and email communications in general), the workload of managing the
   infrastructure, security (User Registration and Maintenance,
   Compliance, SPAM/Phishing/DDoS/Site Takeover protection, etc.), and
   site continuity can also be pretty burdensome, especially if it's an
   individual effort.
   I haven't been very active on the list since the 1990's, so I can't
   really speak to the current community requirements.  Other members of
   the community would certainly be more qualified to answer that, than I
   would.
   Some questions that probably need to be addressed (and may have already
   been answered) are:
   1) Is an email-only messaging system preferred -
   YES
   (with a separate web site classified page  - if
   really thought necessary)?
   (e.g. mailman (or similar), with an additional classified/marketplace
   website)
   2) Is the community open to a web-based forum   - Personally
   speaking. an email system like Wayne's seems ideal
- with email alerting and an integrated classified section?  (e.g.
   phpbb or similar forum(s) with email notification and a classified
   section)
   3) How many members are currently on the list, and what is their
   geographic distribution/nationality (e.g. cost, performance, and
   compliance rightsizing) - Is this really relevant? -
   people should be able to join and leave as wished
   4) How many members could (or would) serve as moderators?   -   I
   would volunteer but am afraid I don't have the necessary technical web
   expertise
   5) How many lists/forums would be needed?   -
   Perhaps just one
   6) Should the list/forum be maintained as a separate effort, or should
   it be rolled into the LSA, etc.?
- Being a  truly international list has been a great
   feature and strength of Wayne's system and ought to continue as such
   without necessarily being held by any one national society.body
   (e.g. sponsorship, personal vs. organizational liability, domain
   ownership/transferability,  futureproofing, and user rules/guidelines)
   PS What might also be good, would be the ability to send parts of
   messages in bold/italic etc which the current system  seems to put into
   plain text. For example, my interpolations here would be clearer if put
   in bold.
   On 9/5/20, 2:22 AM, "Jurgen Frenz"
   <[1][email protected]> wrote:
   I'm a bit confused about the status of this discussion - are we
   still looking for a hosting service? I am subscribed to some other
   music + sound related lists that seem to be of an acceptable format
   [2]https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/create
   It takes an admin to create the list and manage members etc.
   Jurgen
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/create
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: My web site (long and probably tedious)

2020-09-05 Thread Ron Banks
Jurgen,

I don't really know who (if anyone) is working on a replacement for the lute 
list(s) and a classified site, or how far along they've gotten in the process.  
Also, Wayne's early comments in this thread about not replicating the old list 
and classified site are also very appropriate, since his sites were based on 
proprietary code.   It might also be a very good time to verify what the 
community needs really are, as they may have changed since 1998.  While I love 
the portability of this list (and email communications in general), the 
workload of managing the infrastructure, security (User Registration and 
Maintenance, Compliance, SPAM/Phishing/DDoS/Site Takeover protection, etc.), 
and site continuity can also be pretty burdensome, especially if it's an 
individual effort.

I haven't been very active on the list since the 1990's, so I can't really 
speak to the current community requirements.  Other members of the community 
would certainly be more qualified to answer that, than I would.

Some questions that probably need to be addressed (and may have already been 
answered) are:

1) Is an email-only messaging system preferred (with a separate web site 
classified page)?  (e.g. mailman (or similar), with an additional 
classified/marketplace website)
2) Is the community open to a web-based forum with email alerting and an 
integrated classified section?  (e.g. phpbb or similar forum(s) with email 
notification and a classified section)
3) How many members are currently on the list, and what is their geographic 
distribution/nationality (e.g. cost, performance, and compliance rightsizing)
4) How many members could (or would) serve as moderators?
5) How many lists/forums would be needed?
6) Should the list/forum be maintained as a separate effort, or should it be 
rolled into the LSA, etc.?  (e.g. sponsorship, personal vs. organizational 
liability, domain ownership/transferability,  futureproofing, and user 
rules/guidelines)

Thanks,

Ron Banks



On 9/5/20, 2:22 AM, "Jurgen Frenz"  wrote:

I'm a bit confused about the status of this discussion - are we still 
looking for a hosting service? I am subscribed to some other music + sound 
related lists that seem to be of an acceptable format

https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/create

It takes an admin to create the list and manage members etc.

Jurgen







To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html