Re: Upgrading to Mailman 3

2021-01-17 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 2:20:13 PM AEDT Peter Hall via luv-main wrote: > I tried to do a similar Mailman 2 -> 3 upgrade and ended up rolling back to > Mailman 2 even though it is unsupported. > > Mailman 3 has much higher minimum memory requirements than Mailman 2. If > th

Re: Upgrading to Mailman 3

2021-01-16 Thread Peter Hall via luv-main
I tried to do a similar Mailman 2 -> 3 upgrade and ended up rolling back to Mailman 2 even though it is unsupported. Mailman 3 has much higher minimum memory requirements than Mailman 2. If the server is memory bound you might run into some trouble. Cheers, Pete On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 04

Re: Upgrading to Mailman 3

2021-01-16 Thread Jason White via luv-main
On 1/16/21 6:59 AM, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote: We currently run Mailman 2 which is not supported in Debian/Bullseye which will freeze soon. So upgrading will force an upgrade to Mailman 3 (which is a good thing anyway), above are the upgrade docs. One thing to note is that URLs

Upgrading to Mailman 3

2021-01-16 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/migration.html We currently run Mailman 2 which is not supported in Debian/Bullseye which will freeze soon. So upgrading will force an upgrade to Mailman 3 (which is a good thing anyway), above are the upgrade docs. One thing to note is that URLs

Re: mailman

2020-05-02 Thread Rick Moen via luv-main
Quoting Russell Coker (russ...@coker.com.au): > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959435 > > Mailman has just been removed from Debian/Unstable because it is "obsolete". > Why would it be regarded as obsolete and if so what should we replace it wit

mailman

2020-05-02 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959435 Mailman has just been removed from Debian/Unstable because it is "obsolete". Why would it be regarded as obsolete and if so what should we replace it with? -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Bl

Re: mailman breaking DKIM

2015-10-17 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 09:43:01 PM Mark Trickett wrote: > > Note that a problem that was reported in the past was Mailman replacing > > spaces with tabs when folding the Subject header. Obviously we don't > > want to regenerate that problem so changing the behavior of all headers

mailman breaking DKIM

2015-10-17 Thread Russell Coker
I have found the cause of the DKIM problems. When Mailman unfolds and refolds the DKIM-Signature header it replaces tabs with spaces. This makes the difference between a message that passes according to /usr/bin/dkimproxy-verify (part of the libmail-dkim-perl package) and one that fails

Re: mailman breaking DKIM

2015-10-17 Thread Sean Crosby
On 17 October 2015 at 07:24, Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> wrote: > > > The way Mailman works is that it parses the headers and then re-folds them > to > write the message. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802047 > > I've filed a b

Re: Mailman question

2012-10-29 Thread Chris Samuel
On 30/10/12 16:32, Chris Samuel wrote: Problem is I don't see a script that will let me change a members settings, might have to do it all through the web interface, and there are 79 of them.. Aha, this looks like what I'm after.. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2005-May

Re: Mailman question

2012-10-29 Thread Chris Samuel
On 30/10/12 16:47, Craig Sanders wrote: http://www.msapiro.net/scripts/set_nodigest.py [...] also, several other mailman related scripts in parent url: http://www.msapiro.net/scripts/ Wonderful, thanks Craig! -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC