Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Ray via luv-main
On 30.09.2016 13:26, Rick Moen via luv-main wrote: Quoting russ...@coker.com.au (russ...@coker.com.au): People who have chosen systemd have spent a lot of time making it work better and solving some real problems that other init systems have had for many years. People who want to choose

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Rick Moen via luv-main
Quoting russ...@coker.com.au (russ...@coker.com.au): > People who have chosen systemd have spent a lot of time making it work better > and solving some real problems that other init systems have had for many > years. People who want to choose SysVInit have spent a lot of time flaming > people

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
On Friday, 30 September 2016 2:54:42 PM AEST Ray via luv-main wrote: > Many thanks for an excellent summing up, I was going to put forward a > response but your reply has covered all my points nicely. One thing > though I will say is I was quite disturbed about the level of hostility > in

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Rick Moen via luv-main
Quoting Paul van den Bergen (paul.vandenber...@gmail.com): > Fanbois huh? vi or emacs? ftp://linuxmafia.com/pub/humour/ed-is-the-standard-text-editor (For some reason, many Yanks cannot seem to locate my humour directory. I blame the education system -- lamentable problems spelling the

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Andrew Pam via luv-main
On 29/09/16 16:12, Rick Moen via luv-main wrote: ftp://linuxmafia.com/pub/humour/ed-is-the-standard-text-editor I miss TECO. Oh no, wait, no I don't. Cheers, Andrew ___ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Rick Moen via luv-main
Quoting Andrew Pam (and...@sericyb.com.au): > On 29/09/16 16:12, Rick Moen via luv-main wrote: > >ftp://linuxmafia.com/pub/humour/ed-is-the-standard-text-editor > > I miss TECO. Oh no, wait, no I don't. > > Cheers, > Andrew {laughs} But what does your _name_ do in TECO? ;-> (I

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 3:20:37 PM AEST Paul van den Bergen via luv- main wrote: > Fanbois huh? vi or emacs? > > I'm going to be critical here - it is rare that you have personal choice > over the tools your system uses. Do the job in front of you. If that means > you support windows ME

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Andrew Pam via luv-main
On 29/09/16 17:12, Rick Moen via luv-main wrote: On 29/09/16 16:12, Rick Moen via luv-main wrote: But what does your _name_ do in TECO? ;-> It makes me glad emacs and vi were created! :P Cheers, Andrew ___ luv-main mailing list

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Chris Samuel via luv-main
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 5:00:39 PM AEST Andrew Pam wrote: > I miss TECO. Oh no, wait, no I don't. Grin, I think I missed that one, instead having to use FRED on a Honeywell L66 running GCOS-3 (from memory). That was a pure line editor, because the L66 only had a line input mode as

Re: How to make systemd more reliable

2016-09-29 Thread Allan Duncan via luv-main
On 30/09/16 08:29, Chris Samuel via luv-main wrote: On Thursday, 29 September 2016 5:00:39 PM AEST Andrew Pam wrote: I miss TECO. Oh no, wait, no I don't. Grin, I think I missed that one, instead having to use FRED on a Honeywell L66 running GCOS-3 (from memory). That was a pure line