Re: zfs vs. recent kernels

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:38:41PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > > as the SSD is fast at large reads (500MB/s), I could also just cache > > metadata and not data. would that make sense do you think? > > it might help. I used to do it and it didn't seem to do much, but > that was on a low memory

Re: zfs vs. recent kernels

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:53:10AM -0400, Robin Humble wrote: > >have you tried setting zfs_arc_min = zfs_arc_max? that should stop > >ARC from releasing memory for linux buffers to use. > > is that what most folks do? no idea. it just seems like something that's worth trying. > as the SSD is

Re: zfs vs. recent kernels

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:39:40PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: >On Monday, 8 August 2016 2:05:47 PM AEST Robin Humble via luv-main wrote: >> I wanted to test ZFS for other reasons though - Lustre ZFS OSDs. >Why can't Lustre run on BTRFS? Lustre doesn't use the ZFS POSIX layer. infographics tell

Re: zfs vs. recent kernels

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:47:10AM +1000, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote: >On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:05:47PM -0400, Robin Humble wrote: >> I've 8G ram which should be heaps. limiting l2arc to 1G didn't help >> either. >l2arc or arc? if l2arc, 1G isn't really worth bothering with and may >even

Re: webdav

2016-08-01 10:33 GMT+02:00 Glenn McIntosh via luv-main : > Anyone have thoughts on WebDAV clients for Android? > I regularly use DavDroid [1] to synchronize contacts and calendars of my OnePlus One and Nexus 7 with an OwnCloud from a provider. It works well yet, and better