Re: [Lwip] [E] [6lo] fragment forwarding implementation and performance report

think it will change the inferrences much. We also wanted to try different (higher) node densities which i feel might further cause problems for fragment forwarding. Among other things we also want to experiment with fragment acknowledgement mechanism. But we havent really validated all these points.

[Lwip] fragment forwarding implementation and performance report

Hello All, We tried experimenting with the virtual reassembly buffer and fragment forwarding drafts. One fundamental characteristic that has major implications on fragment forwarding performance is its behavior with realistic 802.15.4 RF (especially when a train of fragments are

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

I support adoption of this document. I'm specifically interested in understanding if ESP control overhead can be reduced for LoWPAN deployments and the security implications of the guidelines. Thanks, Rahul On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 13:21, IETF Secretariat < ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote:

Re: [Lwip] Early chair review of Neighbor Management Policy for 6LoWPAN

Thank you Mohit for the review. We have incorporated most of your comments and updated the ID. Please find my responses inline. Best, Rahul On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 15:11, Mohit Sethi wrote: > > Hi Rahul and co-authors, > > Here is my early chair review of the Neighbor Management Policy draft. I >

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

+1 I ve reviewed two versions of this draft and I feel that the work is relevant and will be useful for implementors. It incorporates design traits of different open sources which will help in design choices. Will continue reading/reviewing this work in the future. On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, IETF

[Lwip] Constrained TCP draft

Hi Carles & co-authors, Foll are my comments for the draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-03: 1. Section 4.3 Window Size [RJ] A single MSS implies max one in-flight segment ... While such a mechanism sure will help reduce implementation complexity and the buffer requirement on the

Re: [Lwip] Comments of draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy-00

Thank you Zhen for the review and comments... Please find my responses inline ... cheers, Rahul On 14 July 2017 at 06:18, Zhen Cao wrote: > Dear Rahul and co-authors, > > Many thanks for the hard work in contributing this draft to the lwig > wg. (I am copying roll and

[Lwip] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy-00.txt

Dear all, As presented in ietf97, the draft has been uploaded. Since the topic is relevant to 6lo, roll, and 6tisch, have marked these groups in cc. The policy describes the considerations for managing the neighbor cache especially in a scenario where network density is larger than the neighbor