>
> After all, I think there should not be many packets processed uselessly if
> the MAC filters them out correctly.
>
Exactly - nowadays when we use switches, most of traffic is either unicast
adressed to our device or broadcast.
Regards,
Krzysztof
___
On 2013-06-25 20:24, Pomeroy, Marty wrote:
I am familiar with 61508 but never had to develop under it. And while I
am a big fan of lwIP, I would be concerned about using it in a 61508
application - you might spend far more effort in certification than
porting it.
Let me push back a bit - Do you
I am familiar with 61508 but never had to develop under it. And while I
am a big fan of lwIP, I would be concerned about using it in a 61508
application - you might spend far more effort in certification than
porting it.
Let me push back a bit - Do you really need a full stack in a
"minimalistic
hunybal wrote:
> hello evry one i cant understand why in lwip first check the type ,protocol
> and and after check the ipaddr and hwaddr .why at the beginning dont
> check this parameter to Prevention useless Process?
It would help if you wrote which file you are referring to.
After all, I
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:25:02PM -0400, Bill Auerbach wrote:
> Maybe because the protocol and type checks are 2 byte checks while the ip
> address and hwaddr checks total 10 bytes to check?
And maybe because ARP/IPv6/PPPoE are dealing with broadcast/multicast
addresses, so checking the add
Maybe because the protocol and type checks are 2 byte checks while the ip
address and hwaddr checks total 10 bytes to check?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: lwip-users-bounces+bauerbach=arrayonline@nongnu.org
[mailto:lwip-users-bounces+bauerbach=arrayonline@nongnu.org] On Behalf
Of
On 2013-06-25 08:23, FreeRTOS Info wrote:
Hi,
Hello - I will provide my opinion from my experience working in the aero
space industry, and later in 61508 certification for SafeRTOS...but it
is just opinion. What you need to do is talk to your certification body
about your plans up front, before
