For any Dragon Ball Z fans out there, this STM bug looks like Majin Buu
to me...
Anyway, glad you managed to solve your issue Michael, next user with an
STM bug will be charged ;^) I wonder if the SICS can take donations...
As per the tcp_poll() vs tcp_sent() in your scenario, it depends on what
I'm running LwIP 1.4.1 and have some questions about the event_callback() in
sockets.c
In my project, I am experiencing a crash related to synchronization in
event_callback() and an application thread calling select(). My project is a
uniprocessor system running an RTOS that implements a
Sergio R. Caprile wrote:
Anyway, glad you managed to solve your issue Michael, next user with an
STM bug will be charged ;^) I wonder if the SICS can take donations...
I would take donations as well :-) I'm not getting paid for this, and my slooow
2007er MacBook is one of the reasons I
Joel Cunningham wrote:
1) Should SYS_ARCH_PROTECT() do more than just disable interrupts? Something
that would act as a critical section in the case where a context switch
happens?
Up to now, it should block task switching too, I guess. Although this is not
cleanly documented, it's just