Thank You Jifl, Your suggestion was very usefull. Problem resides in
http header, but it wasnt TAB character (probably it was only partial
problem), but content of header, especial first line containing
HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-type: text/html
When I remove this line everything was ok. Newly
Hi all,
I am working with the Win32 port. My question is, when i create a
listening server on a specific port, how can I refuse an incoming
connection on that port? For example, if I want to refuse the connection
from a specific remote IP address, or if i want to refuse the connection
in
Marek Matej wrote:
Thank You Jifl, Your suggestion was very usefull. Problem resides in
http header, but it wasnt TAB character (probably it was only partial
problem), but content of header, especial first line containing
HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-type: text/html
When I remove this line everything
Antonio de Angelis wrote:
Hi all,
I am working with the Win32 port. My question is, when i create a
listening server on a specific port, how can I refuse an incoming
connection on that port? For example, if I want to refuse the connection
from a specific remote IP address,
lwIP does not
Akshat Bisht wrote:
As i said earlier i removed the
__attribute__ ((__packed__)) from in-front of PACK_STRUCT_STRUCT,
it compiles only after that, otherwise i get an error - Error[Pe079]:
expected a type specifier . Can anybody shed light on what is happening
and does removing that part
Akshat Bisht wrote:
What all files might i need to add (apart from the netif/PPP folder) to
use PPP as a stand alone stack?
I'm not sure what you mean by a stand-alone stack. I would expect you need
to do a normal full port of lwIP. I don't think there are any short-cuts
you can take. Look
In data 20 agosto 2008 alle ore 13:12:07, Jonathan Larmour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Antonio de Angelis wrote:
Hi all,
I am working with the Win32 port. My question is, when i create a
listening server on a specific port, how can I refuse an incoming
connection on that port? For
jifl i'm using a already existing TCP/IP stack from IAR (which is also
the company who's OS i'm using). Incidently, the IAR TCP/IP stack has no
support for PPP, only ARP Ethernet. But they allow writing ethernet drivers
for their stack. I'm hoping to put lwip's PPP in that place.
Also is it
I removed all TAB character from page header and left rest of data
untouched, but FF behaves still the same. Then I change header to
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN\
(generated in NVU html editor) and things start to work. (as well as
without header).
So I don't think
Akshat Bisht wrote:
jifl i'm using a already existing TCP/IP stack from IAR (which is
also the company who's OS i'm using). Incidently, the IAR TCP/IP stack
has no support for PPP, only ARP Ethernet. But they allow writing
ethernet drivers for their stack. I'm hoping to put lwip's PPP in
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/lwip-users/attachments/20080820/9de7159a/atta
chment.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:15:27 +0200
From: Marek Matej [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: R: [lwip-users] httpd question
Hey folks,
What's the status of zeroconf in LWIP? I saw in the archives that this was
a topic a few months ago. Anybody using it, working on it or thinking about it
anymore?
Thanks
Ed
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
Well, I guess I can answer my own question...
Sorry, I didn't see this before. Looks like AUTOIP is in 1.3
Cool!
Ed
Ed Sutter wrote:
Hey folks,
What's the status of zeroconf in LWIP? I saw in the archives that this was
a topic a few months ago. Anybody using it, working on it or thinking
Jifl, the only concerns i see are :
1. Difference in the data types of the packets, which a function in the
middle will have to sort.
2. IAR TCP/IP calls the input function of the lower layer, whereas in
lwip lower layer calls the upper layers. i.e. PPP calls IP in lwip for
14 matches
Mail list logo
