Hi
Making very slow progress on this - it isn't a priority task.
Finally got 2 independent network interfaces working concurrently. I can get
them both to get address via DHCP. I can set either as the default and get
communication. One is using standard 'ethernetif.c' to MCU's internal MAC.
The
Am 27.02.2020 um 22:05 schrieb SimonW:
> Yup - bridge is what i want. I want to form a number of IoT nodes that are on
> a mixture of 10/100 wired ethernet and b/g/n/ac WiFi into a single sub-net.
OK. So have you just tested it? It's really not that hard. Just
netif_add() your port netifs without
Yup - bridge is what i want. I want to form a number of IoT nodes that are on
a mixture of 10/100 wired ethernet and b/g/n/ac WiFi into a single sub-net.
--
Sent from: http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/lwip-users-f3.html
___
lwip-users mailing list
Am 25. Februar 2020 22:38:31 MEZ schrieb SimonW :
>[..]
>Makes reference to including IPv4 config and not adding IPv6 addresses.
No, that might be misleading. The netifs get no addresses at all.
>I
>could do with fuller documentation - or better still an example.
This is a standard bridge.
THanks for the reply. Motivation for the question is.
From http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/group__bridgeif.html - the only
documentation that I can so far find:
/This file implements an IEEE 802.1D bridge by using a multilayer netif
approach (one hardware-independent netif for the bridge that
Am 24. Februar 2020 22:45:18 MEZ schrieb SimonW :
>Can anyone point me to an example using the bridge netif that is in
>lwip 2.1?
>Ideally with 1 leg using either an embedded MAC, or RNDIS over USB host
>- I
>have both legs working independently.
>
>Bonus question: I understand that the 2.1
Can anyone point me to an example using the bridge netif that is in lwip 2.1?
Ideally with 1 leg using either an embedded MAC, or RNDIS over USB host - I
have both legs working independently.
Bonus question: I understand that the 2.1 bridge only works with IPV4. Does
anyone know if IPV6 support
