Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-08 Thread Zhen Cao
Hi Mohit, >From the discussion, the potential update is not substantial to the key technique part of this document, it will be fine that we move the new version to the next step. BR, Zhen On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Mohit Sethi wrote: > Hi Tobias > > Your

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-08 Thread Tobias Guggemos
Hey, I don't think this needs another last call, if we don't want to broaden the scope of the document. I just feel that the proposed change would help to understand the actual scope of the document for a first-time-reader. Your proposed text helps, but you can certainly keep the "experiences"

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-08 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi Tobias Your proposed text sounds good to me and I will update the document to reflect the changes suggested. @Chairs: A procedural question; should I go ahead and submit another update as the deadline for last call is now over? --Mohit On 08/08/2017 12:11 PM, Tobias Guggemos wrote: