>From the discussion, the potential update is not substantial to the
key technique part of this document, it will be fine that we move the
new version to the next step.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Mohit Sethi wrote:
> Hi Tobias
I don't think this needs another last call, if we don't want to broaden the
scope of the document.
I just feel that the proposed change would help to understand the actual scope
of the document for a first-time-reader.
Your proposed text helps, but you can certainly keep the "experiences"
Your proposed text sounds good to me and I will update the document to
reflect the changes suggested.
@Chairs: A procedural question; should I go ahead and submit another
update as the deadline for last call is now over?
On 08/08/2017 12:11 PM, Tobias Guggemos wrote: