[Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sethi-gba-constrained-01.txt

2014-02-13 Thread Mohit Sethi
To: Vesa Lehtovirta vesa.lehtovi...@ericsson.com, Patrik Salmela patrik.salm...@ericsson.com, Vesa Lehtovirta vesa.lehtovi...@ericsson.com, Mohit Sethi mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com, Mohit Sethi mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com, Patrik Salmela patrik.salm...@ericsson.com A new version of I-D, draft

[Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00.txt

2015-10-11 Thread Mohit Sethi
...@ietf.org To: Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net>, Heidi-Maria Back <heidi-maria.b...@ericsson.com>, Heidi-Maria Back <heidi-maria.b...@ericsson.com>, Ari Keranen <ari.kera...@ericsson.com>, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@pi

Re: [Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00.txt

2015-10-12 Thread Mohit Sethi
curves. I didn't find anything about P-256 (CoAP's current MTI curve) or the 25519 curves, which are the more likely ones to be used going forward. So I'm wondering a bit what an implementer of IETF IoT protocols can take home specifically here. Grüße, Carsten Mohit Sethi wrote: Folks. Here

Re: [Lwip] draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00 & Crypto Performance

2016-07-26 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi Hannes Please see the responses inline. On 07/25/2016 07:23 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: I have a question regarding draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00. Table 2 shows ECDSA signature performance with TinyECC. The execution time in the first row says 1,858 msec. A different writing style for

[Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt

2016-06-30 Thread Mohit Sethi
Subject:New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:48:04 -0700 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: Mohit Sethi <mo...@piuha.net>, Heidi-Maria Back <heidi-maria.b...@ericsson.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net

Re: [Lwip] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01.txt

2016-07-04 Thread Mohit Sethi
LS memory footprint? Many thanks, Zhen On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com> wrote: Dear all, We have uploaded the next version of our draft documenting the implementation experiences of public-key cryptography on 8-bit micro-controllers. The draft is availa

[Lwip] Review of draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-05

2017-02-03 Thread Mohit Sethi
Dear all The chair has asked me to do the shepherd write up for draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-05. I have gone through the document again and I have some comments that I think should be addressed first. Most of them are minor and editorial in nature. It would be great if the authors can

[Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02.txt

2017-02-10 Thread Mohit Sethi
Dear all We have submitted the next version of the working group document "draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors". The next version can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02 The draft has mostly undergone minor changes since the last IETF. We have addressed

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02

2017-03-09 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi Hannes I had refrained from responding earlier because there was an ongoing discussion about this draft within the IoT directorate. I wanted to wait for it to conclude before responding. But in any case, here is my response: This is how you want to solve the IoT security problem: Use ARM

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-08-11 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi I have read this draft. I find this draft relevant for the working group. I was happy to see in the presentation during IETF 99 on how the different constrained OS implement the TCP stack. +1 for adoption call. --Mohit On 08/11/2017 11:34 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote: The LWIG WG has

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG WG has placed draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-08-11 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi all I have read a previous version of this draft. The draft has already provided useful input to the neighbor discovery work ongoing in 6lo. I believe this work is relevant for the working group. +1 for the adoption call. --Mohit On 08/11/2017 12:49 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote: The LWIG

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-06 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi all The authors of the document believe that it is ready to move forward. During the previous last call we had already received support from several working group members. Based on the feedback during the previous last call, we removed the performance measurements of RSA key sizes

[Lwip] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04.txt

2017-08-09 Thread Mohit Sethi
Object Networks Authors : Mohit Sethi Jari Arkko Ari Keranen Heidi-Maria Back Filename: draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04.txt Pages : 31 Date: 2017-08

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-08 Thread Mohit Sethi
xperiences with those libraries for signing operation on small devices. Regards Tobias -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Mohit Sethi [mailto:mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com] Gesendet: Montag, 7. August 2017 18:20 An: Tobias Guggemos <gugge...@nm.ifi.lmu.de>; Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> Cc:

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-06 Thread Mohit Sethi
agreement. Grüße, Carsten On Aug 6, 2017, at 12:18, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com> wrote: Hi all The authors of the document believe that it is ready to move forward. During the previous last call we had already received support from several working group members.

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-07 Thread Mohit Sethi
should say that this document discusses security architectures and cryptographic functions for authentication/signing only? Just a thought to avoid missunderstandings. Regards Tobias -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Lwip [mailto:lwip-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Mohit Sethi Gesendet: