* Serge Hallyn [2015-10-27 20:05]:
> Otherwise it may start too early and end up taking 10.0.3.1 even
> though eth0 was eventually going to end up on 10.0.3.x.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1510619
>
> Reported-by: Ryan Harper
> Cc: Martin Pitt
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller
---
configure.ac | 1 +
hooks/Makefile.am | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 874b446..29706cc 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@
Packaging standards usually request arch-dependent binaries to be in
the corresponding libdir, i.e. on debian unmount-namespace should be
in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/hooks/unmount-namespace. Putting it
/usr/share will cause the 'lintian' tool to complain with:
E: lxc-pve:
Hi all,
I'm seeing some (what seems to me to be) odd behavior, where only a
task's init process is in its freezer cgroup:
firedrill:~ sudo lxc-info -n proposed
Name: proposed
State: RUNNING
PID:10959
IP: 10.0.3.176
IP: 10.0.4.1
CPU use:
Hello,
I have a security issue in LxC I’d like to report. What is the correct avenue
to report it to?
Best,
-jh
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:36:05PM +, Jesse Hertz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a security issue in LxC I’d like to report. What is the correct avenue
> to report it to?
>
> Best,
> -jh
Hi,
Either GPG-encrypted to both serge.hal...@ubuntu.com and stgra...@ubuntu.com
or reported at
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:08:09PM +0900, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing some (what seems to me to be) odd behavior, where only a
> task's init process is in its freezer cgroup:
>
> firedrill:~ sudo lxc-info -n proposed
> Name: proposed
> State: RUNNING
> PID: