Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] lxc-net: switch After target to network-online.target

2015-10-28 Thread Ryan Harper
* Serge Hallyn [2015-10-27 20:05]: > Otherwise it may start too early and end up taking 10.0.3.1 even > though eth0 was eventually going to end up on 10.0.3.x. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1510619 > > Reported-by: Ryan Harper > Cc: Martin Pitt > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn >

[lxc-devel] [RFC lxc] hooks: put binary hooks into $libdir/lxc/hooks

2015-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Bumiller
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller --- configure.ac | 1 + hooks/Makefile.am | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 874b446..29706cc 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -539,6 +539,7 @@

[lxc-devel] [RFC lxc] hooks: put binary hooks into $libdir/lxc/hooks

2015-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Bumiller
Packaging standards usually request arch-dependent binaries to be in the corresponding libdir, i.e. on debian unmount-namespace should be in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/hooks/unmount-namespace. Putting it /usr/share will cause the 'lintian' tool to complain with: E: lxc-pve:

[lxc-devel] odd freezer cgroup behavior

2015-10-28 Thread Tycho Andersen
Hi all, I'm seeing some (what seems to me to be) odd behavior, where only a task's init process is in its freezer cgroup: firedrill:~ sudo lxc-info -n proposed Name: proposed State: RUNNING PID:10959 IP: 10.0.3.176 IP: 10.0.4.1 CPU use:

[lxc-devel] Security Issue in LxC

2015-10-28 Thread Jesse Hertz
Hello, I have a security issue in LxC I’d like to report. What is the correct avenue to report it to? Best, -jh signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org

Re: [lxc-devel] Security Issue in LxC

2015-10-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:36:05PM +, Jesse Hertz wrote: > Hello, > > I have a security issue in LxC I’d like to report. What is the correct avenue > to report it to? > > Best, > -jh Hi, Either GPG-encrypted to both serge.hal...@ubuntu.com and stgra...@ubuntu.com or reported at

Re: [lxc-devel] odd freezer cgroup behavior

2015-10-28 Thread Christian Brauner
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:08:09PM +0900, Tycho Andersen wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing some (what seems to me to be) odd behavior, where only a > task's init process is in its freezer cgroup: > > firedrill:~ sudo lxc-info -n proposed > Name: proposed > State: RUNNING > PID: