[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] c5e7a7: Revert "cgfsng: avoid tiny race window"

2018-10-02 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc Commit: c5e7a7acbf23f0c267179b3318af41423b39493a https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/c5e7a7acbf23f0c267179b3318af41423b39493a Author: Stéphane Graber Date: 2018-10-02 (Tue, 02 Oct 2018) Changed paths: M

[lxc-devel] [lxd/master] candid: Cleanup code a bit

2018-10-02 Thread stgraber on Github
The following pull request was submitted through Github. It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxd/pull/5095 This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author unless they happen to be subscribed to this list. === Description (from pull-request)

[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] c7f493: utils: fix lxc_set_death_signal()

2018-10-02 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc Commit: c7f493aee01806ec154d2af5c84a41a9baeecbe2 https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/c7f493aee01806ec154d2af5c84a41a9baeecbe2 Author: Christian Brauner Date: 2018-10-02 (Tue, 02 Oct 2018) Changed paths: M

[lxc-devel] [lxc/master] utils: fix lxc_set_death_signal()

2018-10-02 Thread brauner on Github
The following pull request was submitted through Github. It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/2669 This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author unless they happen to be subscribed to this list. === Description (from pull-request)

[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] ee455b: cgfsng: do not reuse another monitor's cgroup

2018-10-02 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc Commit: ee455be41cd127dd9fb37f35a2ee826e637bb76d https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/ee455be41cd127dd9fb37f35a2ee826e637bb76d Author: Christian Brauner Date: 2018-10-02 (Tue, 02 Oct 2018) Changed paths: M

[lxc-devel] [lxd/master] Document LVM support for storage quotas

2018-10-02 Thread dshcherb on Github
The following pull request was submitted through Github. It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxd/pull/5094 This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author unless they happen to be subscribed to this list. === Description (from pull-request)

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Oliver Schad
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:04:12 +0200 Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Yeah, that's probably the key point indeed. The design is based on the > "pets vs kettle" idea, so the expectation is that you are fine with > any of your pod being restarted at any time. And if you use > kubernetes, you'll have a hard

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Oliver Schad writes: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:49:36 +0200 > Free Ekanayaka wrote: > >> I know that folks to run stateful services on k8s, PostgreSQL is one >> of those IIRC. I wouldn't expect MySQL do be fundamentally different. > > Sorry, I have to repeat my point: if the container engine

[lxc-devel] [lxc/master] cgfsng: do not reuse another monitor's cgroup

2018-10-02 Thread brauner on Github
The following pull request was submitted through Github. It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/2668 This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author unless they happen to be subscribed to this list. === Description (from pull-request)

[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] 2291ea: parse: prefault config file with MAP_POPULATE

2018-10-02 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc Commit: 2291ea4a1a40f67d76a108e96cee83cb65038f9a https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/2291ea4a1a40f67d76a108e96cee83cb65038f9a Author: Christian Brauner Date: 2018-10-02 (Tue, 02 Oct 2018) Changed paths: M

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Oliver Schad
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:49:36 +0200 Free Ekanayaka wrote: > I know that folks to run stateful services on k8s, PostgreSQL is one > of those IIRC. I wouldn't expect MySQL do be fundamentally different. Sorry, I have to repeat my point: if the container engine isn't made to run 24/7, what includes

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Oliver Schad writes: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 11:29:30 +0200 > Free Ekanayaka wrote: > >> Oliver Schad writes: >> > If the container layer is unstable, you can't build a stable >> > service on top of it. >> >> How does LXE solve the issue of undesired restarts? I imagine that the >> restarts

[lxc-devel] [lxc/master] parse: prefault config file with MAP_POPULATE

2018-10-02 Thread brauner on Github
The following pull request was submitted through Github. It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/2667 This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author unless they happen to be subscribed to this list. === Description (from pull-request)

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Oliver Schad
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 11:29:30 +0200 Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Oliver Schad writes: > > If the container layer is unstable, you can't build a stable > > service on top of it. > > How does LXE solve the issue of undesired restarts? I imagine that the > restarts are triggered by the k8s control

[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] 99bb3f: cgroups: remove unnecessary line

2018-10-02 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc Commit: 99bb3fa8e8d064145ff4ab8a05cc1389927c0125 https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/99bb3fa8e8d064145ff4ab8a05cc1389927c0125 Author: 2xsec Date: 2018-10-02 (Tue, 02 Oct 2018) Changed paths: M

[lxc-devel] [lxc/master] cgroups: remove unnecessary line

2018-10-02 Thread 2xsec on Github
The following pull request was submitted through Github. It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/2666 This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author unless they happen to be subscribed to this list. === Description (from pull-request)

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Oliver Schad writes: > Hi Free, > > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:36:16 +0200 > Free Ekanayaka wrote: > >> Oliver Schad writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > What is wrong with new pod names? >> > >> > Think about a production database, MySQL. You're so proud, it runs >> > since 3 monthes, you tuned it, you

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Oliver Schad
Hi Free, On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:36:16 +0200 Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Oliver Schad writes: > > [...] > > > What is wrong with new pod names? > > > > Think about a production database, MySQL. You're so proud, it runs > > since 3 monthes, you tuned it, you have a great monitoring, you have > >

Re: [lxc-devel] Integration Kubernetes and LXD/LXC

2018-10-02 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Oliver Schad writes: [...] > What is wrong with new pod names? > > Think about a production database, MySQL. You're so proud, it runs > since 3 monthes, you tuned it, you have a great monitoring, you have > great backup/restore procedure, you've tested it, you're the hero of > this MySQL server