On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:59:51AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:53 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > > If autodev is not specifically set to 0 or 1, attempts to deter
I guess I should comment as well...
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 10:59 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:53 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > > If autodev is not specifically s
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:53 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > If autodev is not specifically set to 0 or 1, attempts to determine if
> > > systemd is being utilized and forces autodev=1 to preven
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:53 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > If autodev is not specifically set to 0 or 1, attempts to determine if
> > systemd is being utilized and forces autodev=1 to prevent host system
> > conflicts and collisions.
> >
> > If a
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> If autodev is not specifically set to 0 or 1, attempts to determine if
> systemd is being utilized and forces autodev=1 to prevent host system
> conflicts and collisions.
>
> If autodev is enabled and the host /dev is mounted with devtmpfs
> or /d
Crap...
Playing around with git and I totally forgot to sign off on these
things...
Signed-off-by: Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 20:08 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> If autodev is not specifically set to 0 or 1, attempts to determine if
> systemd is being utilized and forces a
