This commit adds an lxc.network.veth.script configuration option to
specify a script to be executed after creating or configuring the pair
of veth devices. The name of the host sided device is passed as first
argument, so the script can be used to configures routes or firewall
rules related to the
On 10/07/2010 09:30 AM, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> This commit adds an lxc.network.veth.script configuration option to
> specify a script to be executed after creating or configuring the pair
> of veth devices. The name of the host sided device is passed as first
> argument, so the script can be used
Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> I suggest you add a lxc.network.script section where it will be
> called from each instanciate_*
OK, that's what an earlier version of the patch did, so I partially
reverted :-)
> The script should receive always the two parameters:
>
>
> I suggest you add a lxc.network.script section where it will be
> called from each instanciate_*
I thought about that, but I think that name is to generic - it might be
useful to provide several different locations to call a script. In my case,
the obvious location is the instanciation function,
On 10/07/2010 12:32 PM, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
>
>> I suggest you add a lxc.network.script section where it will be
>> called from each instanciate_*
>
> OK, that's what an earlier version of the patch did, so I partially
> reverted :-)
>
>> Th
On 10/07/2010 01:19 PM, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
>> I suggest you add a lxc.network.script section where it will be
>> called from each instanciate_*
>>
> I thought about that, but I think that name is to generic - it might be
> useful to provide several different locations to call a script. In
Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> * lxc.network.script.pre:
>
> IMO, it does not make sense because that means it is the host itself
> which should be modified, so that fall under the host network
> configuration umbrella => administrator job :P
I cannot think of a fit
On 10/07/2010 03:06 PM, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
>
>
>>* lxc.network.script.pre:
>>
>> IMO, it does not make sense because that means it is the host itself
>> which should be modified, so that fall under the host network
>> configuration
