Re: [lxc-devel] cgroup management daemon

2013-12-04 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Tim. On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:53:21PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read traffic at the scale we need. At least from the kernel side, cgroup doesn't and

Re: [lxc-devel] cgroup management daemon

2013-12-04 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@google.com): If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read traffic at the scale we need. Tejun, I am not sure why chown came back into the conversation. This is a

Re: [lxc-devel] cgroup management daemon

2013-12-04 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Victor Marmol (vmar...@google.com): I thought we were going to use chown in the initial version to enforce the ownership/permissions on the hierarchy. Only the cgroup manager has access to the hierarchy, but it tries to access the hierarchy as the user that sent the request. It was

Re: [lxc-devel] making lxcpath a real path?

2013-12-04 Thread Serge Hallyn
Exporting the LXCPATH itself to hook scripts seems good. I don't see the value in having multiple LXCPATHs in the hook scripts. As for allowing ':'-separated paths in LXCPATH, it shouldn't interfere with anything we have now, so if someone wants to work on the patch I'll look at it, but really I

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] add destroy option to lxc-snapshot

2013-12-04 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur cag...@10ur.org Acked-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com --- src/lxc/lxc_snapshot.c | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_snapshot.c

[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] 001940: add destroy option to lxc-snapshot

2013-12-04 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc Commit: 00194067f14f6bba6baeb030662bf7d488904acd https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/00194067f14f6bba6baeb030662bf7d488904acd Author: S.Çağlar Onur cag...@10ur.org Date: 2013-12-04 (Wed, 04 Dec 2013) Changed paths:

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] ubuntu: Fix regression in post-process

2013-12-04 Thread Dwight Engen
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 23:34:43 -0500 S.Çağlar Onur cag...@10ur.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:43:47PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): Hey Stéphane, On Wed,

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] ubuntu: Fix regression in post-process

2013-12-04 Thread S . Çağlar Onur
Hi Dwight, On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Dwight Engen dwight.en...@oracle.com wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 23:34:43 -0500 S.Çağlar Onur cag...@10ur.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:43:47PM -0600, Serge

Re: [lxc-devel] cgroup management daemon

2013-12-04 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@google.com): If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read traffic at the scale we need. Tejun, I am

[lxc-devel] Mailing-list move on Sunday 8th of December

2013-12-04 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hello, You are receiving this e-mail because you are currently subscribed to: lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On this coming Sunday (8th of December), all LXC mailing-lists will be moved to a new home at: http://lists.linuxcontainers.org This is the last step of our migration out of