[lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/2] some cleanup around lxc-create

2010-06-15 Thread Ferenc Wagner 
Hi,

I had a go against lxc-create trying to debug the console issue.
There is still a serious issue: the template scripts use some 'arch'
binary, which isn't present on my system.  What is that?  Why not use
'uname -m' instead?

Thanks,
Feri.

Ferenc Wagner (2):
  remove misleading copypaste comment
  correct template directory documentation

 doc/lxc-create.sgml.in |   11 ++-
 src/lxc/lxc-create.in  |5 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
___
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 0/2] some cleanup around lxc-create

2010-06-15 Thread Daniel Lezcano 
On 06/15/2010 01:59 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
 Hi,

 I had a go against lxc-create trying to debug the console issue.
 There is still a serious issue: the template scripts use some 'arch'
 binary, which isn't present on my system.  What is that?  Why not use
 'uname -m' instead?


There is no particular reason for the 'arch' command, 'uname -m'  should 
be ok too and maybe preferable.

 Ferenc Wagner (2):
remove misleading copypaste comment
correct template directory documentation

   doc/lxc-create.sgml.in |   11 ++-
   src/lxc/lxc-create.in  |5 -
   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Thanks for fixing these nasty things.

   -- Daniel

--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
___
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel