Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-unshare woes and signal forwarding in lxc-start

2010-05-27 Thread Greg Kurz
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:22 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote: I'd say we should setpgrp the container init, forward all signals we can to it, and have a configuration option for the set of signals which should be forwarded to the full process group of the container init. Or does it make sense to

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-unshare woes and signal forwarding in lxc-start

2010-05-26 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes: On 05/13/2010 02:22 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: I attached a proof-of-concept patch which seems to work good enough for me. The function names are somewhat off now, but I leave that for later do you have definitive version for this ? I have some

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-unshare woes and signal forwarding in lxc-start

2010-05-06 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Ferenc Wagner wrote: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes: Ferenc Wagner wrote: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes: Ferenc Wagner wrote: I'd like to use lxc-start as a wrapper, invisible to the parent and the (jailed) child. Of