Hi folks,
do you think it would be possible to make the path set by
-P/--lxcpath or in the config file a _real_ path, e.g.
lxc-ls -P /data1/lxc:/data2/lxc --fancy
?
This could help to support HA scenarios based on DRBD or
a network file system, for example. If one LXC server
dies, then
Hello, guys.
Sorry about the delay.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:43:35PM +, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Additionally, Tejun has specified that we do not want users to be
too closely tied to the cgroupfs implementation. Therefore
commands will be just a hair more general than specifying cgroupfs
Ooh, can you also please cc Li Zefan lize...@huawei.com when
replying?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how
Hello, Tim.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:58:09PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
Thanks for this! I think it helps a lot to discuss now, rather than
over nearly-done code.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote:
Additionally, Tejun has specified that we do not want
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:19:18AM -0800, Victor Marmol wrote:
From my discussions with Tejun, he wanted to move to using inotify so it
may still be an fd we pass around.
Hm, would that just be inotify on the memory.max_usage_in_bytes
file, of inotify on a specific fd you've
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 12:49 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
do you think it would be possible to make the path set by
-P/--lxcpath or in the config file a _real_ path, e.g.
lxc-ls -P /data1/lxc:/data2/lxc --fancy
?
You had me confused for a brief moment, referring to this as
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 12:49 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
do you think it would be possible to make the path set by
-P/--lxcpath or in the config file a _real_ path, e.g.
lxc-ls -P /data1/lxc:/data2/lxc
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:20 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 12:49 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
do you think it would be possible to make the path set by
-P/--lxcpath or in the config
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:20 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 12:49 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
do you think it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Mike,
Of course I understand that the lxc container search path might
lead to confusion in case of ambiguous container names. However,
similar problems exist for $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and others.
How about first match wins?
If lxcpath is a
Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur cag...@10ur.org
---
src/lxc/lxc_snapshot.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_snapshot.c b/src/lxc/lxc_snapshot.c
index f80afe5..1de5671 100644
--- a/src/lxc/lxc_snapshot.c
+++
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
Commit: c5d32181c550f75ef83f13ba1ca2eff3997b3621
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/c5d32181c550f75ef83f13ba1ca2eff3997b3621
Author: Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com
Date: 2013-12-03 (Tue, 03 Dec 2013)
Changed
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:04 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:20 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 12:49
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
Hey Stéphane,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
THe recent reorg of lxc-ubuntu introduced some package installation in
post-process but without first disabling service startup.
As a result, if the cache
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:43:47PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
Hey Stéphane,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
THe recent reorg of lxc-ubuntu introduced some package installation in
post-process but
Quoting Tejun Heo (t...@kernel.org):
Hello, guys.
Sorry about the delay.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:43:35PM +, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Additionally, Tejun has specified that we do not want users to be
too closely tied to the cgroupfs implementation. Therefore
commands will be just
Hello, Serge.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:03:44PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
As I communicated multiple times before, delegating write access to
control knobs to untrusted domain has always been a security risk and
is likely to continue to remain so. Also, organizationally, a
Then that
And can somebody please fix up lxc-devel so that it doesn't generate
your message awaits moderator approval notification on *each*
message? :(
--
tejun
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and
Quoting Tejun Heo (t...@kernel.org):
Hello, Serge.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:03:44PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
As I communicated multiple times before, delegating write access to
control knobs to untrusted domain has always been a security risk and
is likely to continue to remain
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:43:47PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
Hey Stéphane,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
THe recent
If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write
traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read
traffic at the scale we need.
Tejun, I am not sure why chown came back into the conversation. This
is a replacement for that.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:31
I thought we were going to use chown in the initial version to enforce the
ownership/permissions on the hierarchy. Only the cgroup manager has access
to the hierarchy, but it tries to access the hierarchy as the user that
sent the request. It was only meant to be a for now solution while the
real
22 matches
Mail list logo
