Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200 Wojciech Arabczyk ara...@gmail.com wrote: It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. If

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread coolnodje
Hi, you're right on time, I was just beginning to compile lxc from the master branch and looking at options. Thanks for the package, it sounds great. Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800 coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands that actually behave like described in linuxcontainers.org? I mean `lxc-ls

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread coolnodje
done, this is great and seems to be working fine, at least it's as expected. I'll copy in some container now and check that everything is all right. I understand now I wasn't probably enabling enough option during ./configure, but it seemed odd that even the very basic options like --version

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Wojciech Arabczyk
As far as i remember, my hand compilation experience shows, that it is really necessary to build against python3 - otherwise all those --fancy options don't work. ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org

[lxc-users] We need a lxc-top utility

2014-05-20 Thread CDR
Dear Friends I have 20+ containers with the same programs running. All of them are cpu-intensive. But one of them is eating way more CPU than the average. With top I have no idea which container owns that program. Perhaps we need a new lxc-top that would identify the process and the container, and

Re: [lxc-users] We need a lxc-top utility

2014-05-20 Thread István Király
Hello CDR, .. If your containers are accessible over ssh, you can iterate through the containers and run a top or top-like command in each of them. You might need unique users though. for C in $(lxc-ls) do ssh $C top -n 1 sleep 1 done On the other hand, yes, it would be practical to see

Re: [lxc-users] We need a lxc-top utility

2014-05-20 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:07 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends I have 20+ containers with the same programs running. All of them are cpu-intensive. But one of them is eating way more CPU than the average. With top I have no idea which container owns that program. Perhaps we need a