Re: [lxc-users] Container not started

2014-06-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 16:34 -0400, CDR wrote: > I disable selinux in the kernel line, for all my boxes. > I also disable apparmor in Ubuntu servers, using the kernel line. > This issue is difficult to explain. > Any way, I already erased the Fedora virtual machine and installed an > Ubuntu virtual

Re: [lxc-users] Container not started

2014-06-19 Thread CDR
I disable selinux in the kernel line, for all my boxes. I also disable apparmor in Ubuntu servers, using the kernel line. This issue is difficult to explain. Any way, I already erased the Fedora virtual machine and installed an Ubuntu virtual machine, and I am in production. But there is a big issu

Re: [lxc-users] Container not started

2014-06-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 09:42 -0400, CDR wrote: > I already created a new Ubuntu Host and the container works fine. > The question is: We have been living under the assumption that > containers act like virtual machines, you may move them from host to > host. > It is not the case, I can see. A Fedora

Re: [lxc-users] apparmor profile for systemd containers (WAS: Fedora container thinks it is not running)

2014-06-19 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > All concerned participants: > > Was there any further update on this problem? I'd like to know if we > (I) should be updating the templates for either this aa_profile thing or > for the mount sets. > > IIRC Christian was going to try

Re: [lxc-users] apparmor profile for systemd containers (WAS: Fedora container thinks it is not running)

2014-06-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
All concerned participants: Was there any further update on this problem? I'd like to know if we (I) should be updating the templates for either this aa_profile thing or for the mount sets. Regards, Mike On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 01:00 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi, > > > # lxc-attach -n f20