Re: [lxc-users] Container Migration

2015-02-09 Thread Tycho Andersen
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:30:19PM +0100, Thouraya TH wrote: Hello all :) *Is there a tutorial that specifies the data that will be imported during a migration of a container? only CRIU **images?* *Tycho: Both the CRIU images and the container disk will be moved; you can seethis

Re: [lxc-users] LXC 1.1 has been released!

2015-02-09 Thread Boudewijn
On 31-1-2015 19:21, Dirk Geschke wrote: LXC should work fine for unprivileged containers at least with Ubuntu vivid and Debian unstable, other distros typically have an older systemd which hangs during the boot sequence. Now I have (...) Debian wheezy. it fails with systemd: (...) and the

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?

2015-02-09 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dirk Geschke (d...@lug-erding.de): Hi all, I just to follow https://www.stgraber.org/2014/01/17/lxc-1-0-unprivileged-containers/ once more to install a new container and it fails. First of all it was a problem with the access to the directory ~/.local/share/lxc/jessie1

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?]

2015-02-09 Thread Christian Brauner
I think I can help here. Systemd-based unprivileged containers will only work properly with systemd compiled from git (master) or systemd 218 patched with: From: Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 23:12:16 +0100 Subject: core: make EPERM errors when applying OOM

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?]

2015-02-09 Thread Christian Brauner
For the ones unfamiliar with patching software, here is are links to my Google Drive with patched systemd-versions for Fedora 21 and Rawhide, and Archlinux: Fedora: (1) systemd https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_UAut69TSAiTmI3SnN4TzRTaXM/view?usp=sharing (2) systemd-libs

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?

2015-02-09 Thread Dirk Geschke
Hi Serge, now I started lxcfs within gdb: (gdb) where #0 0x7706b610 in __recvmsg_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1 0x00403cdd in recv_creds (sock=8, cred=0x7fffe5b0, v=0x7fffe5af 1\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\001)

Re: [lxc-users] Unprivileged containers on Debian Jessie

2015-02-09 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Xavier Gendre (gendre.rei...@gmail.com): Thanks for your answer. Indeed, it only needs to be done at login and this is my problem. Your solutions work well but all need to login at least one time for each user with unprivileged containers. I admit that my question was not clear :-°

[lxc-users] lxc-top

2015-02-09 Thread CDR
Just out of curiosity, how do I exit lxc-top in Ubuntu 14.04? The letter q means quiet. I do a Ctrl-C, to exit, but I am sure there must be a cleaner way. The man lxc-top says nothing about this ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?

2015-02-09 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dirk Geschke (d...@lug-erding.de): Hi Serge, now I started lxcfs within gdb: (gdb) where #0 0x7706b610 in __recvmsg_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1 0x00403cdd in recv_creds (sock=8, cred=0x7fffe5b0, v=0x7fffe5af

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?

2015-02-09 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dirk Geschke (d...@lug-erding.de): Hi Serge, now I started lxcfs within gdb: (gdb) where #0 0x7706b610 in __recvmsg_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1 0x00403cdd in recv_creds (sock=8, cred=0x7fffe5b0, v=0x7fffe5af

Re: [lxc-users] unprivileged container with systemd?

2015-02-09 Thread Dirk Geschke
Hi Serge, now I started lxcfs within gdb: (gdb) where #0 0x7706b610 in __recvmsg_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1 0x00403cdd in recv_creds (sock=8, cred=0x7fffe5b0, v=0x7fffe5af

Re: [lxc-users] Limit in/oubount network bandwidth

2015-02-09 Thread Joris Michaux
Hi, With iptables traffic shaping ? http://www.szabilinux.hu/bandwidth/ Regards, Joris On 09/02/2015 12:11, Alan Hoffmeister wrote: Hello folks, Is there a way to limit inbout/outbound netwoork bandwidth? Any tutorials? -- Alan Hoffmeister https://twitter.com/alan_hoff

Re: [lxc-users] LXC 1.1 has been released!

2015-02-09 Thread Dirk Geschke
Hi Boudewijn, Now I have (...) Debian wheezy. it fails with systemd: (...) and the nothing happens, I have to use SIGKILL to terminate it. Am I missing something? I might be missing the point completely, but is it not just as in Stéphanes message? Or is your systemd newer than stable?

Re: [lxc-users] LXC 1.1 has been released!

2015-02-09 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Dirk Geschke d...@lug-erding.de wrote: ah, maybe I should try a newer systemd than jessie, jessie is testing. But this is systemd 215-10, where unstable uses systemd 215-11. So I did not expect a difference here. But maybe I should try experimental, this is

[lxc-users] Limit in/oubount network bandwidth

2015-02-09 Thread Alan Hoffmeister
Hello folks, Is there a way to limit inbout/outbound netwoork bandwidth? Any tutorials? -- Alan Hoffmeister https://twitter.com/alan_hoff https://github.com/alanhoff https://keybase.io/alanhoff ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] Block devices not permitted on file system

2015-02-09 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Christian Brauner (subroutinec...@gmail.com): Hello, booting unprivileged ubuntu trusty and vivid container I get the following messaged when shutting them down: umount: /dev/zero: block devices are not permitted on filesystem umount: /dev/urandom: block devices are not