Re: [lxc-users] Eth0 not present on boot

On 09/22/2015 08:08 AM, Guido Jäkel wrote: * Do you use lxc.network.veth.pair to name the hosts side of the veth? Yes. I rename the veth interfaces to match the names of the containers. * Was the Container up and running "just before" and you (re)start it within less than 5min? Yes. When

Re: [lxc-users] Eth0 not present on boot

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > On 09/22/2015 08:08 AM, Guido Jäkel wrote: >> >> * Do you use lxc.network.veth.pair to name the hosts side of the veth? > > Yes. I rename the veth interfaces to match the names of the containers. >> >> * Was the

[lxc-users] Quota on containter root fs

Hi folks! Interested in LXC container quota support for root fs which is loop mounted from image. Tried to use lxc.rootfs.options, but without luck. Tried to remount / with jqfmt=vfsv0... and it remounts successfully, buth then quota utilities don't like /dev/loopX from /proc/mounts because

Re: [lxc-users] Eth0 not present on boot

Dear Peter, * Do you use lxc.network.veth.pair to name the hosts side of the veth? * Was the Container up and running "just before" and you (re)start it within less than 5min? greetings Guido ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] sysctl -p no longer allowed in container

Check /proc/self/mountinfo. /proc/self/mounts actually also shows the truth. I don't know why 'mount' is lying. As for it being ro, I do see this as a step down. If you look at /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/lxc/container-base you see the lengths the policy went to to allow writes only to the