Re: [lxc-users] Experience with large number of LXC/LXD containers

On 2017-04-07 06:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: would you mind opening an issue for this at github.com/lxc/lxd/issues? Just add in all the info you have and, if I understand right that you can't put time into further reproductions, just say so up top so hopefully we won't bug you too much. Here

Re: [lxc-users] Experience with large number of LXC/LXD containers

Quoting Tomasz Chmielewski (man...@wpkg.org): > On 2017-03-13 06:28, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association Web4all wrote: > >Hi lxc-users , > > > >I would like to know if you have any experience with a large number of > >LXC/LXD containers ? > >In term of performance, stability and limitation . > > >

[lxc-users] Manually building an image

I have a particular distribution based on CentOS 7 that I would like to turn into a LXD container. The post from Stephane Graber here below has a section titled Manually building an image, but it gives some pretty generic steps that I'm not entirely familiar with. I'm hoping someone could

Re: [lxc-users] Enabling real time support in containers

On 04/05/2017 06:45 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: I correct in assuming LXC *does* provide a means to enable RT The kernel has hardcoded checks (which are not namespaced) that if you are not (global) root, you cannot set or change the rt policy. I suspect there is a way that could be safely

Re: [lxc-users] Creating a custom LXC container

Dear Nicholas, there's no real difference in proposed procedure, just use lxc-execude to enter a containers enviroment (, i.e. set of namespaces). Or use lxc-attach to attach to a console login of the running container with greetings Guido On 06.04.2017 16:01, Nicholas Chambers wrote: > My

Re: [lxc-users] Creating a custom LXC container

My bad! I didn't realize there was a difference. At the moment I am working with lxc. Also, I forgot to mention, I would ideally like to make an unprivledged container, but can make a privledged container if necessary. On 4/5/17 7:20 PM, Spike wrote: are you suing lxc or lxd? in case it

Re: [lxc-users] Newer upstream releases - Stable for production?

I can confirm that we for sure also depend on the stable 2.0 in xenial. It actually is very easy to install a more recent version nested in 2.0 for specific use cases. 2017-04-05 23:53 GMT+02:00 Stéphane Graber : > Yes, it would be. > > I also disagree that it's what most