Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
On 31 March 2018 at 06:48, Tian-Jian Wu wrote:
> is it possible to start a container with set memory limit (let's say 1G in
> this case) and set its memory limit value to another , for example, 500MB,
> later??
Sure it is, you are able to modify these limits anytime live.
S.
How do I get LXD 3.0 into regular ubuntu server 16.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux
4.12.14-041214-generic x86_64)?
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Sean McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Saint Michael wrote:
> > I am using LCX, plain vanilla. Is
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Saint Michael wrote:
> I am using LCX, plain vanilla. Is there a reading the can help me move to
> LXD 3.0? I am afraid I cannot see why would anybody use LXD vs regular LXC.
> I can do anything I need, so far, with LXC. To copy a container to
I am using LCX, plain vanilla. Is there a reading the can help me move to
LXD 3.0? I am afraid I cannot see why would anybody use LXD vs regular LXC.
I can do anything I need, so far, with LXC. To copy a container to another
server I use rsync with some special parameters.
In general what is the
is it possible to start a container with set memory limit (let's say 1G in
this case) and set its memory limit value to another , for example, 500MB,
later??
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:46:10PM +0900, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I've noticed that cronjobs using "lxc" commands don't work on servers with
> LXD installed from a snap package.
>
> It turned out that:
>
> # which lxc
> /snap/bin/lxc
>
>
> Which is not in a $PATH when executing via cron.
>
I've noticed that cronjobs using "lxc" commands don't work on servers
with LXD installed from a snap package.
It turned out that:
# which lxc
/snap/bin/lxc
Which is not in a $PATH when executing via cron.
In other words - lxc binary is in a $PATH when installed from a deb
package, but is
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 6:08 AM, gunnar.wagner
wrote:
>
> so the 'snap-only' policy I thought would be applied for LXD is not that
> strict then and traditional .deb packages still exist?
>
The way I see it, is that it is just Ubuntu 18.04 LTS that gets the .deb