end
> against hardware RAID at this point.
>
> Stéphane
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:59 PM Steven Spencer
> wrote:
> >
> > Andrey and List,
> >
> > Thanks so much for your response, and we understand all of that. We know
> that if we have 3 containers the s
was the savior, but now we need to repeat our earlier process, and
if we made mistakes, we would like to fix them in the process.
Thanks again for the response, any further information would be helpful.
Steven G. Spencer
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:20 PM Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Steven Spen
Good Morning,
Is there a good link to use for specifying hardware requirements for an LXD
dedicated server?
Thanks,
Steven G. Spencer
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
All,
We have a native LXD server (3.0.0) and I was curious about upgrading to
3.11 via snap. I installed an 18.04 LTS server and then installed lxd via
snap (3.11). I copied a few containers over that I could easily stop on the
native server. Installing 18.04 LTS server installs a native copy of
All,
Regarding the availability of snapd for CentOS 7 (or Red Hat Enterprise),
you need only enable the epel repository prior to attempting to install
snapd:
yum install epel-release
Then install snapd:
yum update
yum install snapd
That's it.
Thanks,
Steven G. Spencer
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 09:34:14AM -0600, Steven Spencer wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > My Google search turned up empty, so I'm turning to the list to see if
> this
> > is possible:
> >
> > * In LXD I make a copy of a container, but want to create a new con
All,
My Google search turned up empty, so I'm turning to the list to see if this
is possible:
* In LXD I make a copy of a container, but want to create a new container
from it
* The container has a static assigned IP address, so if I bring up the new
container with the other one running, I'm
Thomas,
I don't know if you have been able to answer your own question or not, but
moving from 2.x on my workstation to 3.x did not interrupt the containers I
had running on my local machine. It does not mean that if you have a
specific filesystem back end (btrfs, zfs) that there isn't something
Thanks for all of the comments back.
Per Sean McNamara's numbered remarks:
1.) That makes sense and it is what I figured
2.) I'm fully aware of project status coming into a stable state, I was
just trying for some clarity, which both you and Stéphane have provided
3.) This is always a good idea
This is probably a message that Stephane Graber can answer most
effectively, but I just want to know that the LXD project is continuing to
move forward. Our organization did extensive testing of LXD in 2016 and
some follow-up research in 2017 and plan to utilize this as our
virtualization solution
Honestly, unless I'm spinning up a container on my local desktop, I always
use the routed method. Because our organization always thinks of a
container as a separate machine, it makes the build pretty similar whether
the machine is on the LAN or WAN side of the network. It does, of course,
require
nd then see if it
> boots, and fix it where it fails; or you can take the (IMO) easier
> path, and create a new container and then copy over the files you need
> via the host.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Steven Spencer <sspencerw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
Greetings,
Is there a command structure that will allow for an import of an openvz
container into lxd/lxc or is the best method to use a new container and
rsync any content needed?
Thanks,
Steven G. Spencer
___
lxc-users mailing list
tting early feedback on any kind of regression.’
>
>
>
> *From:* lxc-users [mailto:lxc-users-boun...@lists.linuxcontainers.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Spencer
> *Sent:* 19 August 2016 14:39
> *To:* LXC users mailing-list
> *Subject:* Re: [lxc-users] LXC 2.0.4, LXCFS 2.0.3 a
Stéphane,
I was wondering why the Xenial upstream doesn't appear to have 2.0.4 yet. I
have an couple of LXD instances running Ubuntu 16.04 and an sudo apt-get
update && sudo apt-get upgrade returns no new update to LXD.
Thanks,
Steve
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Stéphane Graber
15 matches
Mail list logo
