Re: [lxc-users] Cannot remove a volume that has snapshots

I was unfortunate to choose my containers name such that LXD thinks one is a snapshot of the other. hm. Not sure whether this is the explanation. The volume of a snapshot of test04 would be named *test04/second* and not *test04-second*. (at least it is that scheme I get with 'lxc storage volume

Re: [lxc-users] moving container from default storage pool to another

if you look at lxc move --help there is an option for storage pool. I could imagine something along     lxc move local:[source-container-name] local:[destination-container-name] -s [storage-pool] may move a container amont sotrage pools To test this I'd try with 'copy' (which also has the -s

Re: [lxc-users] LXD project status

so the 'snap-only' policy I thought would be applied for LXD is not that strict then and traditional .deb packages still exist? On 3/29/2018 8:44 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:32 AM, gunnar.wagner wrote: On 3/28/2018 2:45 AM, Michel Jansens wrote: Does

Re: [lxc-users] LXD project status

On 3/28/2018 2:45 AM, Michel Jansens wrote: Does this means LXD 3.0 will be part of Ubuntu 18.04 next month? I guess (as LXD is using snap packages by default, right) it's not a matter of distribution any lomnger but more of distribution able to run snap packages well (which not every distrib

Re: [lxc-users] Is there a reference manual about LXD ?

On 10/21/2017 5:03 PM, Pierre Couderc wrote: Note that it's MUCH easier to use lxd on ubuntu 16.04, with xenial-backports to get the 'best' combination of 'new features' and 'tested'. It has lxd 2.18, with support for storage pools. If you're using this version, the most relevant documentation

Re: [lxc-users] access to snapshots from within the containers

thanks for clarifying On 6/15/2017 1:10 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:41:27PM +0800, gunnar.wagner wrote: not directly related to your snapshot issue but still maybe good to know fact On 6/13/2017 8:37 PM, Michel Jansens wrote: I’m busy discovering LXD v2.0.9 on

Re: [lxc-users] access to snapshots from within the containers

not directly related to your snapshot issue but still maybe good to know fact On 6/13/2017 8:37 PM, Michel Jansens wrote: I’m busy discovering LXD v2.0.9 on Ubuntu 16.04 if you want the most recent (yet regarded stable for production) version of LXD on an ubuntu 16.04 host you'd install it fro

Re: [lxc-users] Need help with static IP address -- Simplest use case.

On 6/10/2017 2:29 PM, Michael Johnson wrote: >> lxc config device add gentoo default nic nictype=bridged name=eth0 parent=br0 ipv4.address=192.168.0.36/24 ipv6.address=none where "gentoo" is the container's Alias and "default" the profile used for the "gentoo" container? actually this would

Re: [lxc-users] Args for lxd init via script

On 5/22/2017 2:35 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, gunnar.wagner mailto:gunnar.wag...@netcologne.de>> wrote: On 5/22/2017 11:55 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: subvolume with btrfs does not provide correct df. zfs dataset provide corr

Re: [lxc-users] Args for lxd init via script

sorry I meantbtrfs fi usage [/path/to/filesystem] On 5/22/2017 2:09 PM, gunnar.wagner wrote: On 5/22/2017 11:55 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: subvolume with btrfs does not provide correct df. zfs dataset provide correct df. isn'tbtrfs subvolume usage /path/to/subvolumethe

Re: [lxc-users] Args for lxd init via script

On 5/22/2017 11:55 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: subvolume with btrfs does not provide correct df. zfs dataset provide correct df. isn'tbtrfs subvolume usage /path/to/subvolumethe tool to get the correct usage data? ___ lxc-users mailing lis

Re: [lxc-users] Args for lxd init via script

just for my understanding ... you want to monitor disk usage on the LXD host, right? On 5/21/2017 5:39 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Mark Constable > wrote: On 5/21/17 4:02 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: My question, is it

Re: [lxc-users] Possible bug

a bit OT related to this thread but from what Fajar has posted here it almost sounds like you shouldn't/couldn't use debian inside a container unless you are prepared to conduct far from trivial post launch system tweaking (reinstalling systemd was mentioned) Is that a valid assumption? On

Re: [lxc-users] Possible bug

I guess it wouldn't hurt to elaborate On Ubuntu 16.04..2 LTS, kernel 4.4.0-78-generic - is that you host OS? - what's the lxc/lxd version you are running - which container are you running (I mean created from which image)? On 5/19/2017 12:06 AM, Saint Michael wrote: On Ubuntu 16.04..2 LTS,

Re: [lxc-users] LXD firewall container?

I know that's only touching your point slightly but (as far as I know) pfSense requires 2 physical WAN ports in order to run. So I'd doubt is can be containerized to begin with On 4/25/2017 12:10 AM, Ron Kelley wrote: Greetings all, I am looking for an easy-to-configure firewall tool that p

Re: [lxc-users] lxd init - howto

hi Fajar, On 4/22/2017 12:04 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:33 PM, gunnar.wagner mailto:gunnar.wag...@netcologne.de>> wrote: is there any how-to about which options to choose and why during the 'lxd init' process available anywhere? Did you re

Re: [lxc-users] lxd init - howto

hi Simos, On 4/21/2017 7:47 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:33 PM, gunnar.wagner wrote: is there any how-to about which options to choose and why during the 'lxd init' process available anywhere? I am interested in writing something up about this. I have a d

[lxc-users] lxd init - howto

is there any how-to about which options to choose and why during the 'lxd init' process available anywhere? ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] change 'lxc [cmd]' to 'lxd [comd]' (for LXD)

On 4/18/2017 5:57 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote: ... the real problem is that the documentation for LXD/LXC should get better so that when you google for Linux Containers, you get new LXD/LXC tutorials and material. I don't think these two issues are related really. Whether there was less and

[lxc-users] change 'lxc [cmd]' to 'lxd [comd]' (for LXD)

just saw it again 'lxc-[cmd]' (LXC Containers) vs 'lxc [cmd]' (LXD Containers) it would be so much less confusing whether LXD would just use 'lxd [cmd]' instead of 'lxc [cmd]' syntax - Am I (being a total novice and all) alone with this thought? - any benefit from the curre

Re: [lxc-users] Run GUI in LXD 2.0+

why does is have to be ubuntu:pokemon? why not any OS ? or is 'pokemon' just a placeholder like 'foo' On 4/15/2017 11:29 PM, Matlink wrote: Well, the lxc 1.0 version didn't require any network stack: it mounted the X11 required files in the container. However in lxc 2.0 I would like a sol

Re: [lxc-users] basic understanding - clarification sought

nted to. The license won't prevent them from doing so. I just think it's unlikely in practice. Sean On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:47 PM, gunnar.wagner wrote: hi everybody, I am a novice to LXC/LXD and am trying to get a basic understanding together. I have grasped some things which I am not

[lxc-users] basic understanding - clarification sought

hi everybody, I am a novice to LXC/LXD and am trying to get a basic understanding together. I have grasped some things which I am not sure about whether I got them wrong or write. Maybe this groups is able and willing to confirm or set things straight for me 1. if you run LXD the lxc com

[lxc-users] right list for LXD?

hi everybody, I want to start using LXD. Is this list the right one for seeking advice or is there any specific LXD mailing list? ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users