Quoting Vivek Singh (vivek.si...@gmail.com):
To make seccomp.full file I coppied all syscall numbers from unistd.h . If
I remove seccomp.full file from lxc.conf it works fine . But with
seccomp.full in lxc config it fails
Are 253, 254, and 255 in your seccomp.full file? Does strace show
you
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 08:08 +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
Hello,
I believe that creating a container as non root user should be
straight-forward.
Sigh... I'm afraid not...
Funny, Serge and I just had a couple of comments in exchange
That depends on what else is listed there. If it's only rootfs,
proc and sys, then sure.
Quoting Piotr R (tytu...@gmail.com):
Does that mean that /etc/fstab within the container should be
modified/removed?
Piotr
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal
Quoting Vijay Viswanathan (vijay.vi...@gmail.com):
Hi
Is there an option where shared mount works and restrict propogation of
unmounts ?
This the sequence to reproduce the issue.
1) make /mnt share mount
2) mount a usb stick on it /dev/sdc - /mnt/usb
[here mount shows :
Quoting Adam Ryczkowski (adam.ryczkow...@statystyka.net):
On Ubuntu, LXC has a nice feature, that allows to execute the script
automatically upon boot, if the link to the configuration file is
present on /etc/lxc/auto.
Unfortunately I need to call a mount-binding script on host before,
so
/mnt
what ever container1 mounts in /mnt is visible on container2
found a thread where entry in fstab matters?
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Quoting Vijay Viswanathan (vijay.vi...@gmail.com):
Hi
Is there an option where
Quoting Flo (florian.engelm...@gmail.com):
Hi,
I try to mount a glusterfs volume on LXC startup. Adding to /etc/fstab:
192.168.219.171:/homes /export/home glusterfs defaults,_netdev 0 0
does mount the volume if I run
mount -a
but not on startup.
This sounds like an issue with your
Quoting Robin Monjo (robin.mo...@applidget.com):
Hello,
Thank you for the answers. My problem is when I untar my rootfs. Got lots of
errors such as:
tar: ./rootfs/dev/mixer: Cannot mknod: Operation not permitted
tar: ./rootfs/dev/ram5: Cannot mknod: Operation not permitted
tar:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 11:06 +0800, Mingjiang Shi wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for answering my question. There was no such
file /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf, so I created one.
However, it still doesn't work after killing the existing
Quoting Flo (florian.engelm...@gmail.com):
Hi,
I've got a general question about limits and kernel parameters. Limits are
process based so I am able to set them inside of an LXC but do I have to
set those limits also on the host itself?
eg. If I want the user (only known in the LXC)
Quoting Joshua Schaeffer (jschaeffer0...@gmail.com):
I still can't get this to work, I'm sure I'm missing something
simple or obvious. To recap, I'm trying to use an LVM logical volume
for my container's /var and /tmp partitions. Since I've been unable
to get this to work, I've just
Quoting Tom Taylor (t...@tommyt.co.uk):
So I've followed this tutorial on a vanilla CentOS 6.5 (x64) hardware
install ... http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/LXC-on-CentOS6
I'm getting the following error when trying to intialise the container ...
# virt-install --connect lxc:/// --name dns
Quoting Joshua Schaeffer (jschaeffer0...@gmail.com):
Yes it failed to start:
1. lxc-create -n testme1 -t debian
2. root@reaver:~# cat /var/lib/lxc/testme1/config | grep lxc.mount.entry
lxc.mount.entry = proc proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
lxc.mount.entry = sysfs sys sysfs
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com):
Quoting Joshua Schaeffer (jschaeffer0...@gmail.com):
Yes it failed to start:
1. lxc-create -n testme1 -t debian
2. root@reaver:~# cat /var/lib/lxc/testme1/config | grep lxc.mount.entry
lxc.mount.entry = proc proc proc nodev,noexec
Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/21/2014 05:49 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Sorry, I'm afraid not :( But so move_pid is what is failing...
which means the create and chown calls have already succeeded.
If you can tell me that today, with latest uptodate packages from
ppa
Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/22/2014 06:25 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Ok, thanks Tamas - this is a bug in how the cgproxy starts up
on an older kernel.
As a workaround until I get it fixed, you can
sudo stop cgproxy
sudo stop cgmanager
sudo rm -rf /sys/fs/cgroup
Quoting Florian Klink (flo...@flokli.de):
Hi Wojtek,
thanks for your answer!
I built a kernel with the same config, but with CONFIG_USER_NS set to y.
lxc-checkconfig now also reports user namespace as enabled.
But when I run lxc-attach, I still see the root file system of the
Quoting Guido Jäkel (g.jae...@dnb.de):
Dear Andreas, Dear Friedemann,
you should not need the whole path and in my opinion you should not use it
because then you don't need to change it if the container root will change
later.
But the mount point inside the container rootfs must exist.
Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/24/2014 04:00 PM, Tamas Papp wrote:
On 02/24/2014 03:36 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/22/2014 06:25 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Ok, thanks Tamas - this is a bug in how the cgproxy starts up
Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
hi All,
What is the status of open files thing?
I see too many open files in a container, but everything works properly
outside of the container but sysctl fs.file-nr shows values from the host.
Therefore I'm a bit confused now.
fs.file-nr is
Quoting Du Jun (dj199...@gmail.com):
Hi, all,
I used lxc-tools to create a linux container. I am trying to transfrom LXC
container configuration into a domain XML fragment using the following
command:
*$ virsh -c lxc:/// domxml-from-native lxc /var/lib/lxc/my_conatiner/config*
However, I
Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:31:16AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Du Jun (dj199...@gmail.com):
Hi, all,
I used lxc-tools to create a linux container. I am trying to transfrom LXC
container configuration into a domain XML fragment
Quoting Vijay Viswanathan (vijay.vi...@gmail.com):
isnt --make-rbind and -rbind the same ?
anyways, I think understood the rslave concept.
You want me make a slave mount (e.g., /mnt ) of some original share mount (
e.g., /media ) and expose only /mnt in the lxc conf right ?
But the
Quoting Craig Ruff (cr...@ucar.edu):
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:53PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
That should now be fixed in git, as all of / gets mounted MS_SLAVE
if / is found to be shared. Now if only /media is shared and not
/, I suppose that's a different case.
I am seeing
Quoting Craig Ruff (cr...@ucar.edu):
Oops, made a major typo. I meant to say I had to do a
mount --make-rslave / to get things to behave.
Ah, that makes a lot more sense :)
So we just need a function to walk all the mounts and convert
them.
thanks,
-serge
I'm waiting to see if someone has some scripts at the ready for
you, but in general you'll need to (a) add a rule on VMA to accept
traffic destined for 10.0.3.0/24 over eth0, and (b) add a route
on vmB to send 10.0.3.0/24 traffic through vmA. Which means
you won't be able to have a 10.0.3.0/24
So does the same thing happen if you don't have the
/var/lib/lxc/container bind mount, and instead do
lxc-start -P /desk1 -n container
?
does 'grep shared /proc/self/mountinfo' show anything?
Quoting Dao Quang Minh (dqmin...@gmail.com):
Hi,
We run a ( sort of ) unconventional FS layout
if that helps.
Daniel.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Quoting Dao Quang Minh (dqmin...@gmail.com):
Hi all,
We encounter a bug today when one of our systems enter soft-lockup when
we try to start a container. Unfortunately at that point
Quoting Sarah Collison (sa...@clingclangclick.com):
Is there an environmental variable or command line option to select a custom
directory for lxc-… template files? I’d like to make changes to the default
for my distribution, but do not want these changes overwritten with a new
version. Is
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
You gave lxc-start '-P /var/lib/lxc/test'. For lxc-create, you did
not give that option, but you gave a custom config file.
Greetings, Serge,-
My understanding
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
The path specified with -P is the path *under* which containers sit.
Ah ha. Of course. Thank you!
Have you tried the buxybox template?
Yes
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Yes, but you need the statically linked version,
sudo apt-get install busybox-static
you can verify whether it is dynamically linked using
ldd
Quoting Kevin Wilson (wkev...@gmail.com):
Michael,
Thanks for your answer. I would appreciate if you will explicitly tell
what should I do exactly, as I want to try it: how do I create the
needed two loopback devices for creating a fedora container inside a
fedora container ?
Note the
Quoting Fabio Kung (fabio.k...@gmail.com):
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 08:52:46AM +1300, Gavin Grieve [DATACOM] wrote:
It sounds like something that should exist so if it doesn't yet, I'm quite
keen to put some time into it.
Coincidence or not, we (at Heroku) have been exploring this area
Quoting Sébastien Kurtzemann (fai...@kurtzemann.fr):
Hi all,
My idea is to create a parent cgroup which defined customer's
ressources like cpu, mem, ...
For example I've a cgroup called customer1 on the subsystem cpuset
on which I pin the first cpu (cpuset.cpus = 1)
In this parent cgroup
Quoting Jäkel, Guido (g.jae...@dnb.de):
Dear Sebastian,
as to my knowledge, with the current version of LXC you might use more than
one configuration file and in addition, there's a file include option in the
configuration parser. And even with an older, you may simulate this by a
little
Quoting Guido Jäkel (g.jae...@dnb.de):
On 2014-03-21 15:24, Serge Hallyn wrote:
[...]. But you may write a little script that will re-read the lxc
configuration and update the definded cgroup entries. @Serge: Such an
lxc-reconfigure command may be something to add to the lxc package
If this is a stock ubuntu 14.04 system, please do file a bug asap
against apparmor. If possible, using 'ubuntu-bug apparmor' from one
of the failing hosts (maybe global04). I haven't seen this myself,
but it sure looks bad.
Quoting Flo (florian.engelm...@gmail.com):
Hi,
after patching 6
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
I've managed to create and start a container with a custom template, here:
https://gist.github.com/nelsnelson/9746073
However, attempting to attach to that container results in this error:
# lxc-attach -n test -- echo hello world
Quoting Aaron Staley (asta...@berkeley.edu):
Resurrecting this thread.
I've tried again on a new machine running Ubuntu 13.10 with lxc
1.0.0~alpha1 and I am still getting the same problem.
I can remount /proc rw, but not ro. I've disabled apparmor (via
Quoting Florian Klink (flo...@flokli.de):
Hi,
I have the problem that filesystems mounted with lxc.hook.pre-mount stay
mounted the whole time, even after the container is stopped.
According to my understandinding, mountpoints mounted by these hook
scripts will be private to the container
Quoting Florian Klink (flo...@flokli.de):
this expands c597baa8f9 and 2c6f3fc932.
It can't happen here as this will affect the host.
So yes, the pre-start hooks by definition cannot happen in
the container's ns (lxc.container.conf says it happens in
the host's namespace).
Perhaps the very top
Quoting Florian Klink (flo...@flokli.de):
this expands c597baa8f9 and 2c6f3fc932.
---
Thanks, this looks right. Two things though:
1. The whole block from lines 1509,1519 should probably be moved to
there instead. Mind you the detect_ramfs_rootfs() does not apparently
do the right thing, but
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
Greetings gentleusers and gentledevelopers,-
Okay, so the Fedora 20 discussion aside, please consider this:
# lxc-create -n outer -t minimal
# lxc-start -n outer -- bash
bash: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for
Quoting István Király (lak...@d250.hu):
Hello List, ..
I have a couple of Fedora containers on a Fedora host.
Everything was working fine for a while but suddenly, users can not login.
- I set password for a certain-user.
- I log in as another-user
su certain-user
password: I enter the
Quoting István Király (lak...@d250.hu):
I updated the kernel, still no go.
Try downgrading to 3.12.
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Quoting Torste Aikio (zok...@gmail.com):
Hello,
I'm trying out LXC containers on my desktop computer running Arch Linux.
When I start a container with Ubuntu my screen flashes black and in some
blinking artifacts appear to left-top corner which persist even after I
I think udevadm trigger
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
Greetings, Serge,-
Here is the additional information that you requested:
https://gist.github.com/nelsnelson/11298117
Thanks for looking into this for me.
Ok, thanks. That looks exactly as I'd expect:
lxc-start 1398611507.445 DEBUG
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
Greetings, Serge,-
I went ahead and tested out a blacklist, using the same lxc instance.
I modified the /var/lib/lxc/test/config to specify the new seccomp policy
file:
lxc.seccomp = /tmp/blacklist
However, now the lxc instance
Quoting Nels Nelson (nels.n.nel...@gmail.com):
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Try doing
sed -i 's/mknod/mknod errno 0/' /tmp/blacklist
and see if it now loads. (errno 0 means it won't allow the mknod,
but will return success as though
/syslog show an apparmor
denial for it? what does strace show?
ubuntu 14.04 apparmor. Thanks!
- Dan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Think I should file a bug? (And against what?)
- Dan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Dear Friends
I defined a new network for libvirtd, after the default network gave
me the same error:
virsh net-start nat
error: Failed to start network nat
error: Unable to set bridge nat0 forward_delay: Read-only file system
Do you have apparmor enabled?
Quoting Robert Pendell (shi...@elite-systems.org):
Here is the information as you requested.
lxc-start -n container -l info -o outfile
lxc-start 1399295274.692 INFO lxc_start_ui - using rcfile
/home/shinji/.local/share/lxc/utest/config
lxc-start 1399295274.692 INFO
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.comwrote:
One gotcha. I haven't tried this in the last year or so but, at one
point, NX was broken on Ubuntu due to dependency failures in some
multimedia packages and libraries
Nak. Not until we hear more from Seth about his devloop or
namespaced devtmpfs. Although a commented-out pair of lines
with an explanation above it would be ok.
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Dear Mike
It does work indeed.
I suggest that the developers add these two lines to the sample
Quoting Robert Pendell (shi...@elite-systems.org):
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting Robert Pendell (shi...@elite-systems.org):
OS: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS x86_64
Kernel: Host-Supplied 3.14.1
Provider: Linode
Host Virtualization: Xen
Could you try applying this patch to the fedora template and show
us the result?
From 2b7717f410b824bd960e3a3ef2c85ea739dc5678 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 22:53:47 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] debug rootfspath in fedora
Signed-off
Quoting Robert Pendell (shi...@elite-systems.org):
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting Robert Pendell (shi...@elite-systems.org):
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Robert Pendell
shi...@elite-systems.org wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:16
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
I just tested and in fact, the memory restriction does not work.
a) set a 5G limit for the container
b) started the container
c) gave 16 G memory to mysql
But did it actually fill up the memory? What is memory.max_usage_in_bytes
showing?
D) restarted mysql
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Does anybody know where in Canonical I may get support for LXC
bridged-NAT networking?
If the box is multihomed, it does not work.Although only one of the
NICs has an IP address, it simply cannot route packets to the network.
You may ping the default gateway,
Quoting Rama Srinivas (ramasrini...@gmail.com):
Hi ,
How to use this library. As per Readme , builiding the library and tools
is OK. But How to build tests ?
You need to add --enable-tests to the configure flags for tests to build.
Also in the lxccontainer.c file , lxcapi_create is
lxc.cgroup.cpuset.mems = 1
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
I think we need to add a configuration to the global lxc.conf whereas
any given container may run only on one NUMA node, and if that is not
possible, it should not even start.
The performance for a container that is contained, so
the handle on LXC
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
lxc.cgroup.cpuset.mems = 1
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
I think we need to add a configuration to the global lxc.conf whereas
any given container may run only on one NUMA node
Quoting Johannes Kastl (m...@ojkastl.de):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I thought running a single application inside a container was one of
the main advantages of lxc over 'full'virtualization like KVM. But it
seems I fail to find a nice tutorial how to do
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:26 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
let me try that setup.
I am a few hours from installing Fedora 20, but, hey, I hate to give up.
If you simply need a GUI, the EASIEST method by far is to:
- install xubuntu-desktop on
Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
Hi folks,
Using the HEAD of the stable-1.0 branch:
Sometimes lxc-start gets stuck. I haven't found a reliable
way to reproduce this (yet), but it seems to be related to
starting and stopping a lot of almost identical LXCs in
parallel
Quoting Marcel Sánchez Toledano (marcelsanch...@gmail.com):
Hi again,
I have created some containers with the this option in the config file:
lxc.group = scenario1
But I can't find the way to stop, start or destroy all the containers at
the same time by group. Is this possible? Or I
Quoting Tomas Vondra (t...@fuzzy.cz):
Hi all,
lxc-newbie here. I'm learning about lxc for a few days, and one of the
things that caught my eye is the possibility to run various mismatching
distributions. For example Gentoo container on a CentOS host, and so on.
The docs I found (e.g. the
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:04 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield
m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
The container is started,
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
The cloning app should intelligently change the mount points to match
the new container's directory.
For example, this is the original mount
lxc.mount.entry = /usr/src /var/lib/lxc/container-35/rootfs/usr/src
none bind 0 0
The config entry should be:
Quoting Morten Steffensen (mst...@emercos.com):
Hello,
I am trying to run multi unprivileged containers each with tomcat7.
I have made one container and cloned it. When starting the second
container i get command get_cgroup failed to receive response. If
i stop the first, I can successfully
Quoting Morten Steffensen (mst...@emercos.com):
This is how i created the containers:
Aha, thanks.
host: ubuntu 14.04 minimal
rootapt-get install lxc
rootgroupadd lxc-adm (groupid 1000)
rootadduser --gid 1000 --home /home/lxcuser lxcuser
rootecho lxcuser veth lxcbr0 2 | tee -a
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Wrong, that RPM was in Fedora, in Ubuntu I connected to a repository.
But lxc-top is not there.
How do I get that utility?
sudo apt-get install lua-lxc
Yeah that really should be more discoverable...
___
lxc-users
Quoting Marc MAURICE (marc.maur...@objectif-libre.com):
Hi,
thanks a lot for your answers.
well ... nothing outside the server should even know about the
container's MAC address. Because if the network setup is the same as
mine, then the provider's router would route all traffic for the
+, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Wrong, that RPM was in Fedora, in Ubuntu I connected to a repository.
But lxc-top is not there.
How do I get that utility?
sudo apt-get install lua-lxc
Yeah that really should be more discoverable...
Note
Quoting Mahmood (mahm...@circleci.com):
Hi,
I'm trying to use unprivileged containers that are inaccessible by
other user in a shared environment. Setting container path to 550
seems to block lxc-start. What are the minimal permissions that I
need to set on the directory so lxc-start can
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
(changed subject to match content)
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:33 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On further test, this seems enough
###
# cat
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
would systemd be happy with it being mounted by lxc using an
lxc.mount.entry? I think that would be preferable to relaxing the
apparmor policy. i.e.
lxc.mount.entry
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
would systemd be happy with it being mounted
Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de):
Hi,
### lxc-start output
30systemd[1]: Starting Root Slice.
27systemd[1]: Caught SEGV, dumped core as pid 12.
30systemd[1]: Freezing execution.
###
Hm, that's unfortunate. I thought lxc.mount.auto = cgroup:mixed
with cgfs would
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:56:03PM +0200, Tamas Papp wrote:
On 06/03/2014 04:50 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
lxc-stop will send SIGPWR (or the equivalent signal) to the container,
wait 30s then SIGKILL init. lxc-stop -k will skip the SIGPWR
Quoting Vladimir Pouzanov (farcal...@gmail.com):
This bug happens with docker, but I don't see any traction on my issue over
there so trying to escalate further. The original bug report is here:
https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/4556, here are all the
interesting details.
I'm
://gist.github.com/farcaller/6fd5b23952675aed894d
it doesn't seem to run ./dockerinit in case of failure.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Quoting Vladimir Pouzanov (farcal...@gmail.com):
This bug happens with docker, but I don't see any traction on my
Quoting Marcel Sánchez Toledano (marcelsanch...@gmail.com):
Partially yes. Thanks for that.
Maybe is a bit offtopic, but.. Do you know any manual or website where I
can found information about creating a image file with BRTFS? I have tried
with no luck...
If you want a loopback file, you
/create-linux-loopback-file-system-on-disk-file/,
but with btrfs instead of ext3) and then:
lxc-create -n template -t ubuntu -B btrfs
and specifing in lxc.rootfs the path mnt/vfs, for example.
Is that correct?
*Marcel Sánchez Toledano*
2014-06-04 15:15 GMT+02:00 Serge Hallyn
Quoting Andre Nathan (an...@digirati.com.br):
Hello
I'm currently running in production a pre-1.0 LXC version. These run a
minimum number of processes as root and a bunch of processes running as
a normal user (eg. apache, cron, syslog-ng). Most container directories
are bind-mounted from
Quoting Steven Howe (howe.ste...@gmail.com):
I have tried adding
lxc.cgroup.device.allow = b 8:17 rwm
to the config file, but that doesn't work.
What do you mean by doesn't work? Are you not allowed to
create the device node? (mknod /dev/sdb1 b 8 17)
Also the time in the
Quoting Ivan Ogai (i...@wikical.com):
Hi,
in an unprivileged container set up following the instructions at
https://www.stgraber.org/2014/01/17/lxc-1-0-unprivileged-containers and having
Ubuntu 14.04 as host, I'm trying to install the Wuala client (a software which
mounts a remote directory
Hey everyone,
sorry for the short notice, should have thought of this before. I
will be doing a bit of a walk-through on user namespaces in a bit
over 30 minutes, at
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1406/meeting/22274/lxc-user-namespace-tutorial/
You can always watch it later, but if you join
Quoting Michael Drüing (mich...@drueing.de):
Hi,
I’m trying to use lxc to simulate networks with dynamips. To do that I create
one bridge device for each network I want to simulate, and I have a template
which sets up a dynamips container and connects it to these bridge devices
However,
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:19:14AM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Hi,
I couldn't find anything in the mailing lists and the commit message
(in commit 2d4b3e3) is rather terse. So, I wonder in which scenarios and why
init.lxc.static is
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com):
Quoting Shidan (shi...@gmail.com):
In the ubuntu docs (https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/lxc.html), it
says that to set a persistant IP address for containers you can add the
following to /etc/lxc/dnsmasq.conf
dhcp-host=lxcmail
Quoting Andre Nathan (an...@digirati.com.br):
Serge,
On 06/04/2014 05:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Andre Nathan (an...@digirati.com.br):
Is there any way around that? Maybe some mount option to map the mount
point's UID and GID to something different inside the container?
Not yet
Quoting Raymond Jender (ray...@yahoo.com):
I made a mistake in explaining my routing issue.
I have since added another container. Each of the two containers
can ping each other. Each of the containers can ping the host.
The host can ping either container.
The containers can ping other
Quoting Ajith Adapa (ajith.ad...@gmail.com):
Hi,
I am quite new to network namespaces and just making my hands dirty
using ip command to create network namespaces.
As per the man page for ip command
By convention a named network namespace is an object at
a namespace without binding it to a process then ?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Quoting Ajith Adapa (ajith.ad...@gmail.com):
Hi,
I am quite new to network namespaces and just making my hands dirty
using ip command to create network
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 20:12 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
Thanks @Michael
I am running lxc 1.0.3 version in rawhide.
Ah. Ok... Understand that lxc-autostart is not fully functional in
1.0.3 and will not autoboot containers on host boot.
Quoting Bill Smith (william.m.sm...@gmail.com):
On Centos and/or Ubuntu, is there a way to configure the host's DNS so that
the containers mapped in dnsmasq.leases are resolvable by nslookup? I know
I could get there by assigning static IPs and adding them to /etc/hosts.
I'm wondering
Quoting Christoph Willing (chris.will...@iinet.net.au):
I'm trying to make unprivileged containers work nicely on Slackware
- with some success. After some updates (kernel config, latest
shadow, latest lxc, install cgmanager) I worked through steps at
Quoting Chris Burroughs (chris.burrou...@gmail.com):
Currently when using lxc-snapshot the snapshot point is the rootfs
dataset. (so something like /lxc/foo/rootfs) I'm trying to
understand why the dataset doesn't also include the config file (so
/lxc/foo/). Isn't that file also needed to
1 - 100 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
