Hi all,
I am trying to set up a VPS using LXC 0.7.4. I want the VPS to have a
static IP address on the same subnet as the host. Here is what I have in
host (Ubuntu 11.04)'s /etc/network/interfaces:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.202
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway
Title: Price Request For lxc.org
FYI, already it's much cheaper:D
tamas
Original Message
Subject:
RE: Price Request For lxc.org
Date:
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:50:23 +
Hello
When I do bridge in Linux machine, the br interface will get the ip address to
represent your guest PC. Then you bridge your VPS to br interface to let the
network work.
/Matthew
From: Jun Yang [mailto:jyang...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2011年9月18日 12:20
To: lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Papp Tamas wrote:
FYI, already it's much cheaper:D
[Snip junk mail with some sort of business proposition]
Please don't quote the full contents of junk mail if you actually decide
to answer them on-list. You have just helped that specific one
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:03:41AM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:40 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Papp Tamas wrote:
FYI, already it's much cheaper:D
What Are you talking about?
That message was perfectly topical.
Maybe read
/Add it to the possible wish list along with the MAC address prefix/
If there is interest in an official LXC vendor MAC address prefix,
I'd like to call your attention to this Linux kernel bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/584048
IEEE does not honor requests for applicant requested id's, but even
for the locally administered,
lxc 6c:78:63
and
LXC 4c:58:43
are both out. l (6c) and L (4c) both have a second nibble c which has a
second-least-significant bit 0
1100
--^-
Too bad, it's nice and high to avoid the bridge low
Hello,
We've looked more at this system as performance begins to degrade:
DUring an scp of a file to one of the lxc containers, iostat shows await
numbers for individual disks hitting 80, but not for sustained amounts of time.
Using ps and top to look at cpu, the scp process is using 70% of
Hi Ivan,
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 18:32 -0600, Ivan Fetch wrote:
Hello,
Along with some other troubleshooting we are doing (separate thread), we are
investigating turning some LXC containers into virtual machines. Does anyone
have experience, or perhaps some write-ups, on going in the other
