On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I
>>> didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I
>> didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low for the answer to
>> this, but no result. It's not rela
On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I
> didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low for the answer to
> this, but no result. It's not related to capabilities, because you can only
> drop capabilities,
Xavi León (2012-03-16 12:26:49 +0100) wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 02/24/2012 01:31 PM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>> Hi all, this message is just to ask for the current state of lxc-attach
>>> support entering into mainstream Linux source code. I
