Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Ajith Adapa
Hi, I have installed all the rpms created by @thomas and followed @michael steps to start a lxc container. I have a doubt. 1. When I give lxc-create command I came across huge download of various files. As per my understanding rootfs is created for new container (where can i get the steps for

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Hello, On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:35 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote: Hi, I have installed all the rpms created by @thomas and followed @michael steps to start a lxc container. I have a doubt. 1. When I give lxc-create command I came across huge download of various files. As per my understanding

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Ajith Adapa
Sorry for the confusion. In case of issue 3, I felt host kernel crashed because of the soft lock issue mentioned in Issue 2.That's the reason I was saying as a result of ... Ideally speaking I haven't done anything other than creating the lxc-container at the time. Once I restarted the host

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote: Sorry for the confusion. In case of issue 3, I felt host kernel crashed because of the soft lock issue mentioned in Issue 2.That's the reason I was saying as a result of ... Ideally speaking I haven't done anything other than creating the

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Ajith Adapa
Hmm sounds one more road block for using lxc in fedora 17 because of systemd. Currently there is no place where there is a guide for starting up with LXC for latest fedora versions. I think a page in fedoraproject would be of great help with the known issues and steps using lxc under various

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:41 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote: Hmm sounds one more road block for using lxc in fedora 17 because of systemd. It's not a roadblock. More like a mile long stretch of stingers (stop spike strips / tire deflators). We're getting there. It's just one more unnecessary puzzle

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 00:02 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: On Saturday, May 18, 2013 09:58:26 AM Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote: Then I have started the container using below command and tried to connect to its shell using lxc-console

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 09:58:26 AM Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote: Then I have started the container using below command and tried to connect to its shell using lxc-console command but I ended up with below message. Ideally I should see a

[Lxc-users] Skype in a container

2013-05-18 Thread Tamas Papp
hi All, Is there a cookbook to run Skype in a container? I upgraded my laptop to Saucy and Skype seems to crash continuously. So I think it would be a good idea to run a Precise container with Skype. 10x tamas --

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 00:02 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: On Saturday, May 18, 2013 09:58:26 AM Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote: Then I have started the container using below command and tried to connect to its shell using lxc-console

Re: [Lxc-users] Regarding creating a LXC container in fedora 17

2013-05-18 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 04:06:30 PM Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 00:02 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: I ran into the same lxc-console issue and managed to solve it by commenting out ConditionPathExists line in