Re: [Lxc-users] Sharing container rootfs

2013-06-07 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Purcareata Bogdan-B43198 wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question regarding containers and their supporting rootfs. Is there > an option for lxc-create that will use a default path (or other backing > store) as rootfs? Not that I know of. However if you don't need

[Lxc-users] passing ath9k child wlanX device directly to guest (no bridging)

2013-06-07 Thread Scott Edwards
This probably applies to other wlan adapters, as the usb variety are getting pretty cheap and it's probably preferable to just give a guest complete ownership of the wlan device (not necessarily the phy, but the ethernet interface). Is this supported in any way, and are their any plans to? My dev

[Lxc-users] Sharing container rootfs

2013-06-07 Thread Purcareata Bogdan-B43198
Hello, I have a question regarding containers and their supporting rootfs. Is there an option for lxc-create that will use a default path (or other backing store) as rootfs? I understand that by specifying -B ... it will try to _create_ the rootfs in an alternate place. In my scenario, I plan

[Lxc-users] init path in config

2013-06-07 Thread John
Good Morning, Is there a config option available to specify the path of the executable to start in the container? I don't want /sbin/init and I don't want to rely on a symlink inside the container. I can specify it when starting a container like this "lxc-start -n mycontainer /path/to/executa

[Lxc-users] init path in config

2013-06-07 Thread John
Good Morning, Is there a config option available to specify the path of the executable to start in the container? I don't want /sbin/init and I don't want to rely on a symlink inside the container. I can specify it when starting a container like this "lxc-start -n mycontainer /path/to/executa