Re: [Lxc-users] LXC and UFW

2013-08-03 Thread Robert Pendell
Well I figured out a solution to the issue. This one I didn't really see anywhere but I had to allow all traffic for the bridge nat interface. I guess it might not actually be a bridge since that's what I was looking at. sudo ufw allow in on lxcbr0 to any sudo ufw allow out on lxcbr0 to any

[Lxc-users] LXC and UFW

2013-08-03 Thread Robert Pendell
Does anyone know of a way to get the two to cooperate with each other? I've tried the solutions that I could find and so far none have seemed to have worked. Here is my configuration. VPS running on Xen-PV using PV-Grub Ubuntu 12.04.2 running kernel 3.9.9 (from Ubuntu Kernel PPA) LXC installed

[Lxc-users] local subnet

2013-08-03 Thread Bretton Woods
the answer is probably yes. is it possible to create a container without a network bridge that is on the same subnet as the host? In fact why do we always create a bridge and another subnet? bretton Just one of those thoughts

Re: [Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies

2013-08-03 Thread Tony Su
Kevin I don't see anywhere the OP described his Host as multi-homed, much less that the Container would be. On general principles multiple NICs only make sense when connecting to multiple physical networks, isolated from one another... But, given the information posted, that is a very big

Re: [Lxc-users] local subnet

2013-08-03 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Bretton Woods woods.bret...@yahoo.co.ukwrote: the answer is probably yes. is it possible to create a container without a network bridge that is on the same subnet as the host? You mean you don't want the host and container to be on the same subnet? Sure. Just

Re: [Lxc-users] local subnet

2013-08-03 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 22:23 +0100, Bretton Woods wrote: the answer is probably yes. is it possible to create a container without a network bridge that is on the same subnet as the host? I believe that is what macvlan was suppose to be for but I never had a good experience with it (ongoing

Re: [Lxc-users] local subnet

2013-08-03 Thread Bretton Woods
Apols, my usual norm is tangental but seems I have gone worse... :) I have been thinking of LXC in terms of server services where the case is often that servers and clients are on the same subnet. Kerberos and authentication, Cups and various others not exactly true but simple same subnet

Re: [Lxc-users] local subnet

2013-08-03 Thread Bretton Woods
ps thanks http://noyaudolive.net/2012/05/09/lxc-and-macvlan-host-to-guest-connection/ From: Bretton Woods woods.bret...@yahoo.co.uk To: m...@wittsend.com m...@wittsend.com Cc: lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, 4

Re: [Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies

2013-08-03 Thread Kevin LaTona
Tony, You are correct I did make an assumption about the OP. When it mentioned wanting a container to be visible from the outside. I made the assumption that meant from outside of the local LAN. Which may or may not be the end case. -Kevin On Aug 3, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Tony Su

Re: [Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies

2013-08-03 Thread Kevin LaTona
Can any one point me towards a good source(s) of information about using multi bridges with LXC's if that is even possible or suggested yet? I came across a Proxmox document that stated a host is capable of 4094 bridges. http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Model Yet I've not found much about