On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:46 +0300, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:25 +0300, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> > > tested f14 and debian squeeze containers on f15 host (systemd)
> > > lxc-ps returns nothing for running container
>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:25 +0300, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> > tested f14 and debian squeeze containers on f15 host (systemd)
> > lxc-ps returns nothing for running container
>
> Confirmed broken for F14 container on F15 host.
>
> Working o
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 17:25 +0300, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> tested f14 and debian squeeze containers on f15 host (systemd)
> lxc-ps returns nothing for running container
Confirmed broken for F14 container on F15 host.
Working on F14 container on F14 host.
Another point on the curve.
lxc-ps -A
On
tested f14 and debian squeeze containers on f15 host (systemd)
lxc-ps returns nothing for running container
[root@lxc ~]# lxc-info --name=f14
'f14' is RUNNING
[root@lxc ~]# lxc-ps --name=f14
CONTAINERPID TTY TIME CMD
[root@lxc ~]#
used lxc from master built a few days ago (haven't see
here is an rpm build for latest master
(bcbd102cba31a0054fe4204a39b5e8a411cde42f)
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/ramezhanna/Fedora_15/
for those who want to test on f15
I will keep following master so keep an eye here for updates as well
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Michael H.
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:06 +0300, Ramez Hanna wrote:
> where can i get that patched code? should i clone master?
Yeah, that would be one way. Daniel checked it into git. So building
from git is probably the best way. It hasn't popped out into a release
yet. Maybe soon. His shot to call.
>
where can i get that patched code? should i clone master?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/02/2011 07:28 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Hey all...
> >
> > So my testing has continued and I've now regression tested the v3 patch
> > and extended my testing. Looks l
On 07/02/2011 07:28 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Hey all...
>
> So my testing has continued and I've now regression tested the v3 patch
> and extended my testing. Looks like, over all, everything came together
> nicely. I'd ack that...
[ ... ]
> IAC... The v3 patch does no harm to existin
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 15:13 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > ...
> > > F15 systemd: Passed.
> > > F12 single mount: Passed.
> > > F13 single mount: Passed.
> > > F14 single mount: Passed.
> >
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 23:04 +, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 15:13 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > ...
> > > > F15 systemd: Passed.
> > > > F12 single mount: Pass
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 15:13 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> ...
> > F15 systemd: Passed.
> > F12 single mount: Passed.
> > F13 single mount: Passed.
> > F14 single mount: Passed.
> > F14 libcgroup:Failed.
> >
> > I had the default /etc/cgco
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
...
> F15 systemd: Passed.
> F12 single mount: Passed.
> F13 single mount: Passed.
> F14 single mount: Passed.
> F14 libcgroup:Failed.
>
> I had the default /etc/cgconfig.conf file and here are the results:
>
> [root@berserker-base ~]# cat
Hey all...
So my testing has continued and I've now regression tested the v3 patch
and extended my testing. Looks like, over all, everything came together
nicely. I'd ack that... Since Serge integrated my minor little patch
into his patch, I don't think this needs a formal ack from me but it
de
13 matches
Mail list logo
