Xavi León (2012-03-16 12:26:49 +0100) wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 02/24/2012 01:31 PM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>> Hi all, this message is just to ask for the current state of lxc-attach
>>> support entering into mainstream Linux source code. I
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/24/2012 01:31 PM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>> Hi all, this message is just to ask for the current state of lxc-attach
>> support entering into mainstream Linux source code. I've seen that
>> there are some patches[1] for 3.0 whi
On 02/24/2012 01:31 PM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> Hi all, this message is just to ask for the current state of lxc-attach
> support entering into mainstream Linux source code. I've seen that
> there are some patches[1] for 3.0 which don't apply cleanly to 3.1 and
> newer, and Christian Seile
Hi all, this message is just to ask for the current state of lxc-attach
support entering into mainstream Linux source code. I've seen that
there are some patches[1] for 3.0 which don't apply cleanly to 3.1 and
newer, and Christian Seiler has sent some more patches[2] to fix some
issues with inheri
