Quoting Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu):
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:27:44 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have recently installed vanilla lxc-0.9.0 under archlinux and
> > > encountered the old "fs is remounted ro" issue wh
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:27:44 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have recently installed vanilla lxc-0.9.0 under archlinux and
> > encountered the old "fs is remounted ro" issue which is supposed to be
> > fixed since https://bugs.launchp
Quoting Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu):
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed vanilla lxc-0.9.0 under archlinux and
> encountered the old "fs is remounted ro" issue which is supposed to be fixed
> since https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/942325 ... The (also
> archlinux) co
Hi,
I have recently installed vanilla lxc-0.9.0 under archlinux and
encountered the old "fs is remounted ro" issue which is supposed to be fixed
since https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/942325 ... The (also
archlinux) containers' rootfs are located on a separate partition m
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> Yes, lxc-shutdown could be in this case very trivial (may be adding
> a couple of things like waiting for the container to stop before
> exiting in order to have a synchronous command).
Hah. Turns out waiting is not *quite* so trivial, bc lxc-wai
On 3/19/2012 9:25 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
>> On 03/19/2012 03:50 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
> > On 03/19/2012 02:45 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >> The problem with lxc is that AFAIK there's nothing standard on the
> >> guest that can tell the host "I can do clean shutdown, don't kill
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> On 03/19/2012 03:50 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> >>On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
> >>>a conta
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 02:45 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> The problem with lxc is that AFAIK there's nothing standard on the
>> guest that can tell the host "I can do clean shutdown, don't kill me!"
>> (the equivalent of xenbus listener check).
>
>
On 03/19/2012 02:45 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
>>> a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching tw
On 03/19/2012 03:50 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
>> On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
>>> a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching two ways to do t
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
> On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
> >a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching two ways to do that.
> >In-line is a patch which modifies lxc-stop
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
>> a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching two ways to do that.
>> In-line is a patch which modifies
On 03/19/2012 12:00 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
> a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching two ways to do that.
> In-line is a patch which modifies lxc-stop to take optional -s and -t
> args - -s for shutdown (mea
Hi,
Thanks to Jäkel's and Fajar's great ideas, we can now cleanly shut down
a container by sending it SIGPWR. I'm attaching two ways to do that.
In-line is a patch which modifies lxc-stop to take optional -s and -t
args - -s for shutdown (meaning send SIGPWR), and -t for a timeout,
after sending
On 06/01/2010 08:27 PM, atp wrote:
> Ok,
> absolutely the last post tonight. I promise.
>
> I fixed the find /var/run -exec rm -f {} command in rc.sysinit.
>
> Now the problem is that the runlevel is written whilst things are
> still shutting down;
>
> /lxc/test01.dev.tradefair/rootfs/var/run/utm
Ok,
absolutely the last post tonight. I promise.
I fixed the find /var/run -exec rm -f {} command in rc.sysinit.
Now the problem is that the runlevel is written whilst things are
still shutting down;
/lxc/test01.dev.tradefair/rootfs/var/run/utmp MODIFY
/lxc/test01.dev.tradefair/rootfs/var/run/
Bad idea to follow up on yourself, however I've got a bit further;
running an inotifywait -m on the file at the same time as I'm tailing
the log file gives you;
lxc-start 1275415483.290 DEBUGlxc_cgroup - using cgroup
mounted at '/cgroup'
lxc-start 1275415483.290 DEBUGlxc_utmp
Hello,
Been looking at getting this patch working;
http://lxc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxc/lxc;a=commitdiff;h=563f2f2ccd2891661836c96f92f047a735355c1b;hp=3bdf52d753ecf347b3b5cbff97675032f2de3e5e
This patch allows to shutdown the container when the system
is powered off in the contai
19 matches
Mail list logo
