Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-23 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 10/23/2012 12:05 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Trimming some overhead we've seen enough of... How about just a devtmpfs? We

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Serge, On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Sun,

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Serge, On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 09:12 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Serge, On Mon,

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Trimming some overhead we've seen enough of... How about just a devtmpfs? We actually now do this by default (as of very

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Trimming some overhead we've seen enough of... How about just

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-22 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:37 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 18:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:21 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:14 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread John
On 19/10/12 16:51, Serge Hallyn wrote: Add: lxc.network.type = empty If you don't have any lxc.network.type sections, then the container shares network with the host, and so the container talks to the host's systemd. (same with upstart) Thanks for the reply, I will try that tomorrow. I

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Serge, I'm going to top post here simply because this is going to go off in a different direction and bringing in an old thread but it is related... Back on February 14 you responded to a message about Fedora 16 in a container, which is

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com): On 19/10/12 16:51, Serge Hallyn wrote: Add: lxc.network.type = empty If you don't have any lxc.network.type sections, then the container shares network with the host, and so the container talks to the host's systemd. (same with upstart)

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Serge, I'm going to top post here simply because this is going to go off in a different direction and bringing in an old thread but it is related... Back on February 14 you

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-21 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:49 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Serge, ... Short of building a custom systemd, I don't know how to fix that problem and I suspect this OP is going to run into this same thing (container taking over host's

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-20 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Serge, I'm going to top post here simply because this is going to go off in a different direction and bringing in an old thread but it is related... Back on February 14 you responded to a message about Fedora 16 in a container, which is something I've been trying to do and I had run into that

[Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-19 Thread John
Hello, I'm in the middle of a migration from init to systemd. I've completed the transition of my host environment and my 6 existing containers continue to work as expected (they all use sysvinit internally). I've started work on a systemd container and am getting some odd effects. First off,

Re: [Lxc-users] systemd inside LXC

2012-10-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com): Hello, I'm in the middle of a migration from init to systemd. I've completed the transition of my host environment and my 6 existing containers continue to work as expected (they all use sysvinit internally). I've started work on a systemd container and am