On 01/07/2012 04:31 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> # apt-cache policy lxc
> lxc:
> Installed: 0.7.2-1
> Candidate: 0.7.2-1
> Version table:
> 0.7.5-17~artax1 0
> 500 http://archive.progress-linux.org/progress/ artax-backports/main
> amd64 Packages
> 0.7.2-1artax12 0
> 5
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:47:06PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> no offence and no hard feelings, but you seem to lack very basic debian
> knowledge, and in order to give you instruction spelled out for each and
> everything, i would need to know your existing configuration.
>
> what does 'apt-c
On 01/06/2012 09:12 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Even doing that, it still doesn't offer to update lxc. So this is not an
> effective way to get from 0.7.2 to 0.7.5. I've no doubt with the right
> invocation this can work. But trying to achieve that is becoming far more
> trouble than just building f
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:56:23PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 08:32 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> > The keys installed fine. But "apt-get install -t artax-backports lxc
> > linux-2.6" complains that linux-2.6 doesn't exist. And "apt-get install -t
> > artax-backports lxc" says there'
On 01/06/2012 08:32 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> The keys installed fine. But "apt-get install -t artax-backports lxc
> linux-2.6" complains that linux-2.6 doesn't exist. And "apt-get install -t
> artax-backports lxc" says there's nothing to do.
linux-2.6 is not a package; i forgot to say 'you shoul
> you don't need to pull in all packages. you can use artax-backports
> excately the same as squeeze-backports (means, apt-get install -t
> artax-backports lxc linux-2.6). that way, you get only that what you
> want/need (though upgrading all packages is ok and supported, unlike
> squeeze-backports
