Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> On 03/13/2012 11:05 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> >>On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Serge Hallyn
> >> wrote:
> >>>Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> One more, I think very important question.
> >>
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> On 03/13/2012 08:02 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> I'm sorry for the late answer.
>
> >Hm, perhaps /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate should be updated to not run
> >in a container.
> >
> >It also might be worth removing CAP_SYS_TIME from the container's
> >rig
On 03/13/2012 08:02 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
I'm sorry for the late answer.
> Hm, perhaps /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate should be updated to not run
> in a container.
>
> It also might be worth removing CAP_SYS_TIME from the container's
> rights.
Yes, that's true.
> You mean to run after the cont
On 03/13/2012 11:05 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Serge Hallyn
>> wrote:
>>> Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
One more, I think very important question.
Still there is no nice stop method in init config
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Serge Hallyn
> wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 03:23 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> >>> Dear Fajar,
> >>>
> >>> i just googled http://www.makelinux.net/man/7/P/power-s
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Serge Hallyn
wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 03:23 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
>>> Dear Fajar,
>>>
>>> i just googled http://www.makelinux.net/man/7/P/power-status-changed .
>>> There's written:
>>>
>>> Th
On 03/14/2012 03:23 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
>> Dear Fajar,
>>
>> i just googled http://www.makelinux.net/man/7/P/power-status-changed .
>> There's written:
>>
>> This event is not handled in the default Upstart configuration.
>>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> Dear Fajar,
>
> i just googled http://www.makelinux.net/man/7/P/power-status-changed .
> There's written:
>
> This event is not handled in the default Upstart configuration.
>
>
> For control-alt-delete, the corresponding sentence st
Dear Fajar,
i just googled http://www.makelinux.net/man/7/P/power-status-changed .
There's written:
This event is not handled in the default Upstart configuration.
For control-alt-delete, the corresponding sentence states:
In the default Upstart configuration handling of
>After some experiments, upstart ignores SIGPWR, but still listens to
>SIGINT, and killing the process from the host works. So modifying the
>containter's control-alt-delete.conf to run "shutdown -h" instead of
>"shutdown -r" can let the host tell the guest to shutdown cleanly.
Dear Fajar,
becaus
>Can the host send a signal to the init's container? If yes, sysvinit
>responds to SIGINT. Does upstart behave the same (e.g. process
>control-alt-delete.conf when the signal is received)? It's set to
>reboot by default, but perhaps there's some other signal than we can
>use for shutdown?
SysVIni
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Baumann
> wrote:
>> On 03/14/2012 02:37 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> That unfortunately won't work with upstart in the host and guest.
>>
>> too bad then.
>>
>> since i have absolutely no clue about
>From what I know - as upstart is also on rh6 - you need to issue a
>reboot/shutdown directly from inside the guest.
Olivier
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 03/14/2012 02:37 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Is that the optional use of l
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 02:37 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> That unfortunately won't work with upstart in the host and guest.
>
> too bad then.
>
> since i have absolutely no clue about upstart at all.. i just hope there
> can be found/made an equivalent
On 03/14/2012 02:37 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Is that the optional use of lxc-halt, which does chroot $rootfs telinit 0?
yes.
> That unfortunately won't work with upstart in the host and guest.
too bad then.
since i have absolutely no clue about upstart at all.. i just hope there
can be found/m
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
> On 03/13/2012 11:05 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Once lxc-attach is supported we should do that, yes.
>
> no need to; just look at the debian package.. we're doing that properly
> since long time ago already.
Is that the optional
On 03/13/2012 11:05 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Once lxc-attach is supported we should do that, yes.
no need to; just look at the debian package.. we're doing that properly
since long time ago already.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Serge Hallyn
> wrote:
> > Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
>
> >> One more, I think very important question.
> >> Still there is no nice stop method in init configuration:
> >>
> >>
> >> for f in /etc/lxc
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Serge Hallyn
wrote:
> Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
>> One more, I think very important question.
>> Still there is no nice stop method in init configuration:
>>
>>
>> for f in /etc/lxc/auto/*; do
>> c="$(basename $f .conf)"
>>
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> On 03/08/2012 09:27 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> > hi All,
> >
> > I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
> >
> > Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
> > suggestion:
> >
> > 1. I suggest ntpdate not t
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> hi All,
>
> I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
>
> Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
> suggestion:
Thanks, Papp.
> 1. I suggest ntpdate not to be installed (remove after debootstrap).
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> On 03/08/2012 04:30 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> > On 03/08/2012 09:27 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> >> hi All,
> >>
> >> I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
> >>
> >> Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
On 03/11/2012 12:06 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
>> Are these questions or requests somehow not good?
>> I'm really interested in them:)
> I'm guessing that while your suggestions are vallid, most of which are
> related to guest creation and the
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> Are these questions or requests somehow not good?
> I'm really interested in them:)
I'm guessing that while your suggestions are vallid, most of which are
related to guest creation and the template scripts. Since the existing
ones work, I imagi
On 03/08/2012 04:30 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 09:27 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
>> hi All,
>>
>> I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
>>
>> Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
>> suggestion:
>>
>> 1. I suggest ntpdate not to be inst
On 03/08/2012 09:27 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> hi All,
>
> I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
>
> Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
> suggestion:
>
> 1. I suggest ntpdate not to be installed (remove after debootstrap).
> Also I think 'u
26 matches
Mail list logo
