Ah, nice one!
Thanks Stéphane. :-)
Jean-François
Le 16/06/2013 21:24, Stéphane GAUTIER a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> No udev is not useful in containers. The problem is that they are
> installed by dependencies.
> To enable the standard installation without udev installed, we use "Fake
> Packages" with vers
> Perhaps because eth0 exists before systemd and udev start?
>
> doing udevadm trigger --action=add would cause the uevent to be
> resent
I thought of that, but running udevadm trigger ... does not appear to
make systemd happy. Units that depends on the given device will still
fail to start becau
Quoting Lars Kellogg-Stedman (l...@oddbit.com):
> > Perhaps because eth0 exists before systemd and udev start?
> >
> > doing udevadm trigger --action=add would cause the uevent to be
> > resent
>
> I thought of that, but running udevadm trigger ... does not appear to
> make systemd happy. Units t
Quoting Lars Kellogg-Stedman (l...@oddbit.com):
> Howdy all,
>
> I've run into an issue with systemd and udev and LXC containers; I
> originally posted this to the systemd-devel list
> (http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-January/008362.html),
> but I'm curious if anyone here
