Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-14 Thread Miroslav Lednicky
Hello, I can confirm it too! Thank you. Dne 14.6.2012 09:12, Fajar A. Nugraha napsal(a): > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: >> I can confirm that using (1) and (2) together solves the problem. Many >> thanks again for your help! > > FWIW, linux-image-3.2.0-25-generic is rel

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-14 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: > I can confirm that using (1) and (2) together solves the problem. Many > thanks again for your help! FWIW, linux-image-3.2.0-25-generic is released, and from my test you now only need (1), like Stéphane mentioned earlier. -- Fajar > On Sa

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-13 Thread Jan Den Ouden
I can confirm that using (1) and (2) together solves the problem. Many thanks again for your help! On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 06/09/2012 06:38 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stéphane Graber > wrote: > >> On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, F

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 06/09/2012 06:38 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano >>> wrote: On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: > Hi, > > About

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 06/09/2012 06:38 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano >>> wrote: On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: > Hi, > > About

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-09 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano >> wrote: >>> On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: Hi, About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this lis

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-08 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I >>> didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-08 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: >> Hi, >> >> About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I >> didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low for the answer to >> this, but no result. It's not rela

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-08 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, Jan Den Ouden wrote: > Hi, > > About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I > didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low for the answer to > this, but no result. It's not related to capabilities, because you can only > drop capabilities,

Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-07 Thread Jan Den Ouden
Hi, About a week ago I posted exactly the same question on this list, but I didn't get any responses. I have googled high and low for the answer to this, but no result. It's not related to capabilities, because you can only drop capabilities, not add them. It's not related to the cgroup memory con