Re: [Lxc-users] Making LXC accept an already open network interface—or other options

2011-05-09 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com): Hi, At $work we're currently using KVM and setting it up so that it uses a previously opened TAP interface: 'kvm -net tap,fd=3'. This way, we are able to create the interface a set up a couple of ebtables filters on it before going on. Now, we

[Lxc-users] local routing

2011-05-09 Thread Ulli Horlacher
I have a lxc host (zoo 129.69.1.68) with a container (vmtest8 129.69.8.6). I want all host/container communication to be internal without network traffic going via external router. I know I can setup host routes like: root@vms2:# route add -host 129.69.8.6 gw 129.69.1.68 root@vms2:# route -n

Re: [Lxc-users] local routing

2011-05-09 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 05/09/2011 03:10 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: I have a lxc host (zoo 129.69.1.68) with a container (vmtest8 129.69.8.6). I want all host/container communication to be internal without network traffic going via external router. Maybe I misunderstood but why don't you setup a bridge for the

Re: [Lxc-users] local routing

2011-05-09 Thread Ulli Horlacher
On Mon 2011-05-09 (22:52), Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 05/09/2011 03:10 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: I have a lxc host (zoo 129.69.1.68) with a container (vmtest8 129.69.8.6). I want all host/container communication to be internal without network traffic going via external router. Maybe