Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 3/4] Subject: lxc-ubuntu: Default to current ubuntu release.

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 02:41 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > If can't match any valid release, use lucid. > > Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > --- Applied. -- All the data continuously generated in your IT

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 2/4] lxc-ubuntu: Base arch detection code on debootstrap's with some additions when we don't have dpkg or udpkg

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 02:41 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Changelog: [seh] Don't take arch from environment > > Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > --- Applied. -- All the data continuously generated in yo

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 1/4] templates: consolidate and extend ubuntu templates

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 02:41 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Consolidate lucid, maverick, natty, and oneiric templates into one 'ubuntu' > template. > > Add support for specifying architecture. > > Add support for '--trim|-x' option, which removes services like the lucid > template used to. This creates smaller,

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 4/4] Clarify the template-specific options a bit in lxc-create's help

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 02:41 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > This does not supplant the need for a manpage, but it's a start. > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > --- Applied. -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructu

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 1/2] print netdev name, not link, after moving dev into netns

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > --- Applied. I postpone patch 2/2 Thanks. -- Daniel -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitiv

Re: [Lxc-users] autofs in lxc containers?

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 11:54 AM, Fred Liu wrote: > Daniel, > > Thanks. > > But I have searched the archive of this list. And it seems you have a > solution: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/894 Yeah. I sent the patchset to the mailing list maintainer but in the meant

Re: [Lxc-users] autofs in lxc containers?

2011-06-25 Thread Fred Liu
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/894 > > Yeah. I sent the patchset to the mailing list maintainer but in the > meantime with some stree test I hanged the kernel, so there is a race > somewhere I should have to fixed but forget to continue with this patch. > >

Re: [Lxc-users] autofs in lxc containers?

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/25/2011 04:45 PM, Fred Liu wrote: >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/894 >> >> Yeah. I sent the patchset to the mailing list maintainer but in the >> meantime with some stree test I hanged the kernel, so there is a race >> somewhere I should have to fixed b

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 2/2] cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places

2011-06-25 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Serge, On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 12:54 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > I.e. with systemd or libcgroup. > > To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or > otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a > container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under t

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 2/2] cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > I.e. with systemd or libcgroup. > > To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or > otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a > container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under the > root of each fs.

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 2/2] cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places

2011-06-25 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 20:05 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > I.e. with systemd or libcgroup. > > > > To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or > > otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a > > container in ever

[Lxc-users] multiseat with LXC

2011-06-25 Thread Oleg Motienko
Hello, Did anyone try to run *isolated* multiseat with LXC (for example, 3 seats, VGA + DVI + HDMI monitors using integrated video and 3 USB keyboards/mouses)? -- Regards, Oleg -- All the data continuously generated in

Re: [Lxc-users] multiseat with LXC

2011-06-25 Thread Oleg Motienko
Hm, google say that it is possible to use only 2 of 3 sockets at the same time on most modern video chips... For 3rd monitor we need additional videocard. On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 22:31, Oleg Motienko wrote: > Hello, > > Did anyone try to run *isolated* multiseat with LXC (for example, 3 > seats,

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH 2/2] cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/25/2011 08:19 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 20:05 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: >>> I.e. with systemd or libcgroup. >>> >>> To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or >>> otherwise taking the first cgro

[Lxc-users] lxc on fedora 15 (was : cgroups: support cgroups mounted in multiple places)

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 06/24/2011 07:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > I.e. with systemd or libcgroup. > > To do this, instead of looking for one cgroup called 'lxc' or > otherwise taking the first cgroup we find, we actually create a > container in every mounted cgroup fs. Right now it's done under the > root of each fs.