Firstly, am just starting to look at LXC as a possible migration from
OpenSolaris, so excuse me if question is obvious.
Reading what I have found so far, it seems clear that with a bridged
interface on the global side, the Containers can all have separate
network info (different IPs, subnets) an
Here are the patchsets for 2.6.34.1 and 2.6.35-rc6.
Quilt actually made my life easier:-)
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:50, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 11:32 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>> We could update his patchset to v2.6.35-rc6 and resend on containers@
>>> to start a thread on
On 07/28/2010 11:32 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> We could update his patchset to v2.6.35-rc6 and resend on containers@
>> to start a thread on the topic. nop ?
>>
>
> Are you willing to do it ? I think it is worth to have this feature in
> the kernel, so we can implement the lxc-shutdown/lxc-reboot
On 07/28/2010 11:35 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
> Is there a kernel scheduler that works better than the others for lxc
> (CFS, anticipatory or deadline)?
>
> Does it matter?
I have to admit I don't know :)
I think I always used the CFS.
-
Is there a kernel scheduler that works better than the others for lxc
(CFS, anticipatory or deadline)?
Does it matter?
--
Sebastien Pahl
@sebp
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Devel
On 07/28/2010 11:15 AM, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 11:09 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/28/2010 11:00 AM, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
Am I correct in my assumptions?
>>>
>>> yes. here's our patch for 2.6.34
>>
On 07/28/2010 11:15 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> No, except more network namespace support (I don't remember what are the
>> subsystems), and more robustness. There is also the slow unmount regression
>> spotted on the 2.6.32 kernel which i
On 07/28/2010 11:15 AM, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 11:09 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/28/2010 11:00 AM, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
Am I correct in my assumptions?
>>>
>>> yes. here's our patch for 2.6.34
>>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> No, except more network namespace support (I don't remember what are the
> subsystems), and more robustness. There is also the slow unmount regression
> spotted on the 2.6.32 kernel which is fixed for 2.6.34, so the system
> container starts
On 07/28/2010 11:09 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 11:00 AM, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>>> Am I correct in my assumptions?
>>>
>>
>> yes. here's our patch for 2.6.34
>>
>> we should be pushing this patchset to mainline kernel.
On 07/28/2010 11:07 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/28/2010 10:59 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
>>>
>>> Does it have to be in the quilt format?
>>
>> Yes if possible. You can send me directly a tarball, I will upload it to the
>> web site.
>>
>
On 07/28/2010 11:00 AM, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
[ ... ]
>> Am I correct in my assumptions?
>>
>
> yes. here's our patch for 2.6.34
>
> we should be pushing this patchset to mainline kernel. Did Eric plan to
> do so ?
Yes, he planned to merge it ups
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:03, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 10:59 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
>>
>> Does it have to be in the quilt format?
>
> Yes if possible. You can send me directly a tarball, I will upload it to the
> web site.
>
Sure no problem.
By the way are there any differences
On 07/28/2010 10:59 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
> Nice thats what I thought. I will build a 2.6.34.1 kernel. If
> everything works like expected I will send you the updated patchset.
Cool. Thanks !
> Does it have to be in the quilt format?
Yes if possible. You can send me directly a tarball, I wil
On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to adapt the patch for lxc-attach to 2.6.34.
> A few hunks fail but they are trivial to fix.
> There is only one where I'm not sure:
>
> <-->
>
> Index: 2.6.33/kernel/cgroup.c
> ==
Nice thats what I thought. I will build a 2.6.34.1 kernel. If
everything works like expected I will send you the updated patchset.
Does it have to be in the quilt format?
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:51, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm tryi
On 07/28/2010 10:41 AM, Sebastien Pahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to adapt the patch for lxc-attach to 2.6.34.
> A few hunks fail but they are trivial to fix.
> There is only one where I'm not sure:
>
> <-->
>
> Index: 2.6.33/kernel/cgroup.c
> ==
Hi,
I'm trying to adapt the patch for lxc-attach to 2.6.34.
A few hunks fail but they are trivial to fix.
There is only one where I'm not sure:
<-->
Index: 2.6.33/kernel/cgroup.c
===
--- 2.6.33.orig/kerne
Hi,
I'm trying to adapt the patch for lxc-attach to 2.6.34.
A few hunks fail but they are trivial to fix.
There is only one where I'm not sure:
<-->
Index: 2.6.33/kernel/cgroup.c
===
--- 2.6.33.orig/kerne
19 matches
Mail list logo
