Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
for d in `/bin/ls`; do
echo 1 $d/cgroup.clone_children
done
Doing this step alone broke lxc totally for me, with or without the
patch below. This was on Fedora 15 testing with lxc 0.7.4.2 as well as
Do
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
fedora 15 has a patched kernel with utrace.
By patched, you mean utrace is not upstream?
Are we sure, utrace is pid namespace aware ?
I've not looked at it, no.
My natty container booted on fedora 15 but is stuck at:
\_ lxc-start -n natty
On 06/26/2011 05:09 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
fedora 15 has a patched kernel with utrace.
By patched, you mean utrace is not upstream?
Right.
Are we sure, utrace is pid namespace aware ?
I've not looked at it, no.
My natty container booted
On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
for d in `/bin/ls`; do
echo 1 $d/cgroup.clone_children
done
Doing this step alone broke lxc totally for me, with or without the
patch below. This was on Fedora 15
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
I reported the problem some month ago.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636210
When running a debian container, there is no problem.
Dude, does redhat have a maintainer for the package? I think
they informally closed the bug
On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
for d in `/bin/ls`; do
echo 1 $d/cgroup.clone_children
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2011 05:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
for
Looking at the sources and Serge's patch...
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 13:33 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2011
On 26/06/2011 16:46, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
I usually launch my containers with 'sudo lxc-start -nname'.
The problem with this is the fact it doesn't get my back to a shell
prompt.
To have what I want, I have to workarround, with screen or end the
command line with ''.
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 13:56 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Looking at the sources and Serge's patch...
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 13:33 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:27 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2011 05:52 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 17:46 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
I usually launch my containers with 'sudo lxc-start -n name'.
The problem with this is the fact it doesn't get my back to a shell
prompt.
To have what I want, I have to workarround, with screen or end the
command
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 14:00 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
Thanks, Michael, good catch.
Now wait a minute. Is that a typo here:
No it's not, but:
char *s = index(retbuf, '.');
If you're doing, in effect, a dirname here
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 14:00 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
Thanks, Michael, good catch.
Now wait a minute. Is that a typo here:
No it's not, but:
char *s = index(retbuf,
13 matches
Mail list logo
