Hi,
*My basic need::*
I am writing a *simple socket programme *and as input to programme I want
to give the* IP address of containers*. Now* I have IP address in
sequential order*, but to make my socket programme running I need the
networking service of the containers to start.
*I am able to do
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:42 +0530, nishant mungse wrote:
Hi,
My basic need::
I am writing a simple socket programme and as input to programme I
want to give the IP address of containers. Now I have IP address in
sequential order, but to make my socket programme running I need the
Zhu Yanhai (2011-12-13 12:00:20 +0800) wrote:
On 12/12/2011 09:47 AM, István Király - LaKing wrote:
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is, what
the best, most elegant and fail proof technique for that?
It's not only an issue about disk space, it's about
2011/12/13 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net:
Zhu Yanhai (2011-12-13 12:00:20 +0800) wrote:
On 12/12/2011 09:47 AM, István Király - LaKing wrote:
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is, what
the best, most elegant and fail proof technique for that?
Zhu Yanhai (2011-12-13 18:43:41 +0800) wrote:
2011/12/13 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net:
I've carried out some tests with union mount points and Btrfs seeds and CoW
copies, and all of them seem to work without problems with LXC.
Thank you Ivan.
My concern is deploying Btrfs
Quoting Fiedler Roman (roman.fied...@ait.ac.at):
Hello List,
I have problems finding information about lxc with system virtualization and
access restriction to /proc/kcore. In my setup, root in guest can read
/proc/kcore, data from host shows up in container kcore, so kcore is not
I always hate replying to my own posts but I have stumbled onto some
interesting clarification as I've continued to play with this...
Below in-line.
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 01:30 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 08:43 +0100, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Sun 2011-12-11
