Re: [Lxc-users] kernel.shmmax in LXC

2012-06-14 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jan Den Ouden jan...@denouden.info wrote: I can confirm that using (1) and (2) together solves the problem. Many thanks again for your help! FWIW, linux-image-3.2.0-25-generic is released, and from my test you now only need (1), like Stéphane mentioned earlier.

Re: [Lxc-users] IPv4 container in a non-IPv4 main system ?

2012-06-14 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote: I suggest you try ubuntu precise (with its kernel 2.6.32). Possibly on your workstation first (e.g. with virtualbox/kvm). I meant kernel 3.2 -- Fajar

[Lxc-users] small improvement to lxc scripts

2012-06-14 Thread -- NeoX --
Hi all, did not you get annoyed by lxc-ls mixing available and running containers ? here is my lxc-ls that put an echo before each category of container making life easier when using lxc-ls simply replace the provided lxc-ls by this one (change are line 24 and 26 with 2 simples echo.

Re: [Lxc-users] small improvement to lxc scripts

2012-06-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting -- NeoX -- (exitn...@hotmail.com): Hi all, did not you get annoyed by lxc-ls mixing available and running containers ? How do you mean mixing? The first line is available containers, the second line running ones. Nothing wrong with scripts, especially custom local ones, having

Re: [Lxc-users] small improvement to lxc scripts

2012-06-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com): Quoting -- NeoX -- (exitn...@hotmail.com): Hi all, did not you get annoyed by lxc-ls mixing available and running containers ? How do you mean mixing? The first line is available containers, the second line running ones. Nothing