On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
> My bad, I bridged eth0.211 and eth0.103 with br0. Could I know the
> problems it would cause?
>
>
At the very least, you effectively merge vlan 211 and 103. No point in
using vlans any more.
Worst case scenario, depending on your exact co
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 10:18 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > ...
> > > Yeah, I don't think I "need to play a game like this" anymore. I'd have
> > > to go back through some old old E-Mails to see
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:30 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using?
> >
> > I'm using head. I'm not specifying a tree.
>
> ?
>
> I'
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using?
>
> I'm using head. I'm not specifying a tree.
?
I'm not sure what you mean - are you using git://github.com/lxc/lxc, or
the
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using?
I'm using head. I'm not specifying a tree.
> The results you're getting don't make sense to me... Hoping I can find
> a simple answer.
Me too.
> -serge
Regards,
Mike
--
Mich
Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using?
The results you're getting don't make sense to me... Hoping I can find
a simple answer.
-serge
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps f
Wow...
Pulling for testing. I see some stuff related to devtmpfs that relates
to the systemd / Fedora 17 issues Serge and I have been working on for
the last couple of weeks. I'm going to test these out. It's been an
intense couple of weeks getting THAT to work. Even without some of the
additi
Thanks to everyone for fixing this.
I am about to release the 0.8.0 version.
I will wait a couple of days before adding a tag and release it in case
there are some fixes to add.
Please test.
Thanks !
-- Daniel
On 10/31/2012 04:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This is an automated email from th
My bad, I bridged eth0.211 and eth0.103 with br0. Could I know the problems
it would cause?
I love the way of creating a vlan interface and putting an ip over it.
should try that
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Kalyana sundaram
> wrote
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
> Thanks Fajar. Atlast I got the vlan thingy working
> I added 2 vlans to eth0 (eth0.211 and eth0.103) and connected them to bridge
You assigned eth0 (the trunk) to the bridge, right?
Just checking. Cause if you DON'T assign the trunk, but
Thanks Fajar. Atlast I got the vlan thingy working
I added 2 vlans to eth0 (eth0.211 and eth0.103) and connected them to
bridge br0 and used br0 as a link to container(veth)
To reach the host I used another interface eth1(probably assigning ip to
bridge br0 would have solved that problem)
i should
11 matches
Mail list logo